Analysis: Fascinating
discussion of Mac OS X, 2D graphics performance, and Cocoa vs.
Carbon speed in Maca Only, 12.27.
Where Apple and ATI have gone
before, Dan Knight, Mac Musings, 12.27. Millions of Mac users
deserve better than the second-rate drivers they're getting in Mac
OS X. If Apple and ATI won't deliver, they can at least let
someone else step up to the plate.
Opinion: A realistic look at the
ATI chip conspiracy, Mac Night Owl, 12.26. "If Apple and ATI were
ordered by court or convinced by incessant user demand to commit
resources to get make those older chips work better under Mac OS X,
would it make any difference?"
Rage at being left behind, Dan
Knight, Mac Musings, 12.24. It's official - Apple doesn't plan to
support graphics acceleration for any Mac (except the b&w G3) with
ATI Rage video.
OS X: It's official: Apple
remains committed to sub-standard ATI graphics performance in
OS X, Remy Davison, Insanely Great Mac, 12.22. Apple now
states it does not plan to support acceleration with ATI Rage II+, IIc,
Pro, Pro Turbo, LT Pro, or Mobility chipsets, leaving WallStreet and
Lombard PowerBooks, iMac Rev. A-D, beige G3s, and original iBook and
iBook SE users behind.
OS X: Getting to
the source of Mac OS X, Chris Coleman, O'Reilly, 12.21. "...what
many people don't know is that the source code for much of Mac OS X is
available to the public."
OS X and the beige G3, Adam
Robert Guha, Apple Archive, 12.21. OS X runs decently on a beige
G3, but also cripples the floppy drive, printer port, graphics
performance....
Opinion: Is OS X the real
user friendly Linux?, Charles Moore, Applelinks, 12.21. "...with
the ascendancy of Mac OS X, prospects for a desktop Linux breakthrough
look bleaker than ever."
Opinion: Mac OS X is the
death of Linux on the desktop, Kimbro Staken, XML Databases, 12.17.
"I think Apple has hit the right balance of open and closed source
development and the tide is turning with Mac OS X stealing from the
Linux community."
Early G3s losing support,
12.14. If Symantec is abandoning early G3 support, can Apple be far
behind?
Opinion: OS X and the iMac 266, Alan
Zisman, 10 Forward, 11.30. Some real trials installing OS X 10.0
on a Revision C iMac - but all is fine now.
Web: EverythingMac.org, a
very new site dedicated to the sharing of knowledge about the Unix
underpinnings of Mac OS X.
OS: OS X
set for Mac default in March, Andrew Orlowski, The Register, 11.23.
Apple's Schiller suggests March 2002 as date when OS X will
displace classic Mac OS as default on new systems.
Opinion: Apple,
Aqua, and interface freedom, Michel Munger, On the Flip Side, Mac
Observer, 10.31. Once a supporter of interface freedom, Apple now
blocks efforts to change Aqua appearance.
Unsupported UtilityX 2.0b1 available, Ryan Rempel. New version
designed to be more compatible with future versions of OS X. No
multiprocessor support yet.
Mac OS X:
Firewall at startup, Brennan Stehling, GreasyDaemon.com,
2001.08.28. "By combining the startup process with some firewalling I
was able to build my very own firewall system from scratch in
minutes."
Is
Classic really worth all that much (going forward)?, Paul Shields,
Business Mac, 2001.08.24. "...a compatibility environment like Classic
only encourages developers to drag their feet on producing updated
applications."
OS X for legacy
Macs, Ryan Rempel, Other World Computing, 2001.08.03. Unsupported
UtilityX out of beta stage, allows installing Mac OS X on most PCI
Macs, clones.
At least 256 MB for
OS X, Bill Fox, Macs Only!, 2001.07.09. Testing finds
OS X really benefits from at least 256 MB RAM, especially if
running Classic mode.
Why is OS X slow?, Andrew, Ambrosia Software, 06.20. "The truth of
the matter is that there is no single thing that is causing OS X to be
slow.."
The conversion of an OS X skeptic and Wintel heretic, Joel Davies,
Applelust, 06.20. "I want to trade in my PCs. Permanently. I'm done
with them: If my cute little Pismo can dust a dual Xeon machine
. . . with a still under construction OS, I want no part of
that Wintel box."
Darwin source less than open,
Scott Atkinson, My Turn, 05.30. Linux, Mac OS X, and why the Darwin
source code is less than open.
OS X:
They're baack!, Matt Johnston, osOpinion, 05.15. "I never thought
. . . a single platform . . . would service both
the needs of the seasoned code monkey as well as the needs of my
techno-phobic parents. I've seen that platform now, and its name is Mac
OS X."
Should you run Linux instead of OS
X?, Charles Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 05.09. Why you might
want to run Linux on your Power Mac or PowerBook instead of Mac OS
X.
The
multiprocessor option, Philip Machanick, Macintelligence, Mac
Opinion, 05.09. An introduction to multiprocessing.
The best I can say, Ceolaf, MacinThoughts, Applelust, 04.24. Mac
OS X better than Linux, but not nearly as good as Mac
OS 9.
Evolution
of the Mac OS X user interface, David Miller, osOpinion,
04.24. "...if Apple, a company whose reputation is synonymous with good
design, cannot make an OS that conforms to the industry's
specifications for a proper user interface, who will?"
I'm furious
at Apple, Michael Coyle, ResExcellence, 04.23. "Apple has stopped
your ability to customize the interface of Mac OS X with
themes...."
Why OS X
will work, Chuck Cribbs, osOpinion. "Apple has it right: The
interface is where it has to stand out."
Introduction to Unix: The buzz
words, Eric DeStefano, Mac Metamorphosis, 2/20. Threads,
multiprocessing, memory management, and preemptive multitasking - parts
of Mac OS X.
The end of the Mac as we know
it, Adam Robert Guha, Apple Archive, 2/16. "OS X will change the
way you work with your computer. OS X will act more like
Windows...."
Mac OS X,
Gaggan. "The Mach microkernel permits very fine grained control because
of its basic nature."
Our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For detailed
price quotes and advertising information, please
contactat BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number
is for advertising only.