 |
|
|
 |
||
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
|
Power Macs iMac Channel iBook/PowerBook MacInSchool Computer Profiles iMac Power Mac PowerBook/iBook Performas Mac Clones Older Macs Lisa • NeXT Editorial Archive Mac Daniel's Advice Email Lists LEMchat (uses AIM) Online Tech Journal Consumer advice, reviews guides, deals Software Apple History Best of the Web Best of the Mac Web surveys Miscellaneous Links Best Used Mac Buys Used Mac Dealers Video Cards Mac OS X Mac Linux Macspeak RAM Upgrades About Low End Mac Site Contacts
Support LEMAffiliates
|
The Music Industry Needs to Embrace the Digital Age, Reduce CD Prices, and Avoid Copy Cat Artists- 2003.01.31 Low End Mac Reader SpecialsMemory To Go Special: New 2008 iMac 2GB $42 / iMac Intel Core2 DUO & MacBook Pro 2GB $36 - 1GB $20. MacPro 8 Core Memory 8GB kit $286 / 4GB kit $143 / 2GB kit $93 -- Free shipping available. LIfetime warranty. Download Typestyler, still the Ultimate Styling Tool for Internet, Print and Video Graphics. Works great in Classic with a Native OS X Version on the way. Free Tryout: www.typestyler.com
OWC: Mercury Elite FW800/FW400/USB2/eSATA up to 2.0TB TOP-RATED Solutions offer High Performance, Reliable storage for all your data storage needs. 500GB $159.99, 750GB $199.99, 1.0TB from $299.99 Mac users can finally play Party Poker for Mac. Not only that, they can also learn how to play PokerStars for Mac.
Compare products like desktop computers, laptops, and LCD TVs side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for a new cell phone GPS products or MP3 players. The Ciao network makes searching products easy for you. While browsing the Internet, I came across the headline "Kazaa sues film and record industries." I had heard about several companies attempting to sue Kazaa, but I hadn't heard about this. Kazaa's claims are that the music industry "doesn't understand the digital age and is monopolizing entertainment." None of this really surprises me. After all, the music and film industries tend to be afraid of new things. Cassette tapes come to mind. When double cassette decks became popular in the 1980s, the music industry was afraid that people would purchase tapes and make copies for their friends. They were afraid this form of piracy would cut into their profits - but there wasn't much they could do about it. In 2003, with our advanced digital technology, the music industry has decided to do something - but what it's doing isn't really going to help. The major mistake the recording industry is making is putting the blame on file sharing services, such as Napster and Kazaa. Yes, their profits may be down, but is that the result of people downloading albums instead of buying them - or is it something else? There are a couple of things I blame, and they tie into each other. I'm disappointed at the quality of much recent music. It really seems to be "made to sell," not made to convey a message. I think other people have realized this as well and have simply decided to not buy it. The other problem I see is the record companies overcharging for CDs. I was listening to a program on the radio last night where a caller was explaining that they had just spent $16.99 on a CD. Immediately afterward, another person called in and said they had just spent $18.99. Those prices are absolutely ridiculous given that I can buy a new LP for $9.99. I don't see how record companies can complain about lost profits when it's their own fault that they're losing money. I think that most consumers want the artists to get paid - but if the music isn't any good, what's the point in buying the CD in the first place? Record companies need to be even more selective when signing artists. Most of the pop singers they seem to be signing sound the same - as do many of the "alternative" bands. Why are they signing these types of artists? Well, simply put, it's been tried and proven. At one point, people were buying the Britney Spears type thing. That seems to be over now, but record companies are still signing similar artists. These "no risk" deals are obviously so that record companies won't lose a great amount of profit - but they also aren't generating much profit. Just like record companies like to stick with a medium once it's been proven to sell, they like to stick with a fad of music. A couple that come to mind are the "R&B influenced pop" music in the late 90s and the fairly recent "watered down pop-punk comeback"? (if you dare call it that. Believe me, | I can't complain enough about this incredibly poor excuse for punk rock music). The problem is that they stick with these too long. The record companies need to move ahead with the times if they want to sell CDs. This brings me to digital music. As many people have said before, record companies could take advantage of the digital era in many ways, but before they do so, they need to lower the price of CDs. $18.99 is simply too expensive for a CD with 12 (or maybe 13) songs. At most that CD should cost $12.99. When CDs are once again priced reasonably, more people will purchase them. But for those who want to do it digitally, record companies have been offering 99 cent per song downloads for some time. What if music retailers were to set up stations where people could legally download, burn, and pay for mix CDs? I think it could take off and bring the record companies some profit. They have so many opportunities open to them when it comes to music distribution - but they've been focusing on shutting down file trading services and copy protecting CDs. Let's hope they wake up and figure out what they really need to be looking at. Recent Apple Archive articles
Links for the Day
Recent Content on Low End Mac
LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it. Access our RSS news feed at http://lowendmac.com/feed.xml. Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style. PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use. Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iBook, iMac, eMac, iPod, iPhone, PowerBook, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged. |
