The Next Step for Mac OS X, Part 2
- 2002.04.18
My Turn is Low End Mac's column for reader-submitted articles. It's your turn to share your thoughts on all things Mac (or iPhone, iPod, etc.) and write for the Mac web. Email your submission to Dan Knight .
Yesterday I wrote about replacing the graphical user interface with something more universally intuitive. Several ideas have since occurred to me about GUIs and their potential replacements.
For the record, I am not a Unix lover. I appreciate its power and speed, but I still get a headache thinking about how it actually works, and how its components (such as X-Windows) have superseded superior technologies such as NeWS.
I use Mac OS X as my everyday OS, alongside SGI IRIX and Yellow Dog Linux, so, love it or hate it, I've had to learn a lot about Unix. Mac OS X has addressed a lot of my grudges against Unix, especially by dispensing with the X-Window system, which is the computer equivalent of emptying a truck load of molasses into your car's engine. I still prefer SGI's hardware, but for everyday use, the interface is the computer, and though IRIX is clean and has good plug and play, it still requires knowledge of the command shell.
The big thing that Mac OS X gets right - that most other Unicies get wrong - is configurability. All computers should have three basic levels of configurability. Firstly, very little for the neophyte. This would be akin to the Classic Mac OS, which allows little more than minor cosmetic changes.
It occurs to me that if we are to see new interfaces developed for pervasive computing, that we'll see this sort of permanent, "nonuser serviceable" interface. However, many of us want to delve deeper, and this is where the other two levels come in. Mac OS X allows us to do so by the use of "Advanced" tabs.
Most of us are satisfied with this, but for real tinkering you can call up a console. Now, I'm not saying that the command line is the best way to do this, but at least you can really take control. Of course, there's no reason why this kind of configurability couldn't be offered in other forms.
Traditional Unix-based OSes and pervasive computing interfaces stand at opposite ends of the spectrum. Unix offers ultimate configurability, new interfaces will offer ease of use. As a user, I don't want to be locked out from the system - that's why I don't own an information appliance. On the other hand, if I didn't have to learn how to use Unix, I wouldn't have. I shouldn't have to choose.
So Steve, if your listening, as far as the GUI goes, you got it right with Mac OS X. Make sure you get it right with the next big thing....
Share your perspective on the Mac by emailing with "My Turn" as your subject.
Join us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Google+, or subscribe to our RSS news feed
Today's Links
- Mac of the Day: PowerBook 2300, introduced 1995.08.28. The only Duo equipped with a PowerPC processsor run at 100 MHz.
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content
About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact
Follow Low End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Mac on Facebook
Favorite Sites
MacSurfer
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
The Vintage Mac Museum
Deal Brothers
DealMac
Mac2Sell
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ
Affiliates
Amazon.com
The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
Macgo Blu-ray Player
Parallels Desktop for Mac
eBay
