Stop the Upgrade Insanity

I love the philosophy of low-end computing: Buy only what you need and keep it working until it no longer meets your requirements. Any other strategy seems wasteful.

Over the last five years, the world of the personal computer has seen incredible advances. Sit down and think about the types of machine you were using back in 1996. My main machine at the office was an HP box running a 100 MHz Pentium chip with an amazing 32 MB of RAM. I had just transitioned to Windows 95 and was happy with a huge 2 GB hard drive. At home I was very happy with a new Umax C500 running a 180 MHz 603e processor with 16 MB RAM and a 1.2 GB hard drive.

Flash forward to today - the PC for the office is a nice Sony Vaio subnotebook with an 800 MHz Pentium III chip, 512 MB of RAM, and a 10 GB hard drive. This machine is getting a bit old by today's standards. At home, I have just upgraded to a new Titanium PowerBook 400 with 512 MB of RAM and a 30 GB hard drive. This machine is nine months behind the curve. As I sit down to write this, I am listing all of the things I do with my computer.

• Word
• Excel
• PowerPoint
• Email
• Internet
• MP3 playing and creating
• Burning CDs
• Games

This seems to be the bulk of activity that I need my computer to accomplish. The only items on the list that I couldn't do in 1996 were MP3s and CD burning. Interestingly enough, I have since installed an MP3 player on the Umax (still at home), and it works well. So CD-RW was the only thing I could not do if someone moved me back to my 1996 rigs. Now I understand that I would not be able to run some of the current applications, but I have found no real advances in most of those areas (beyond gaming) in the last five years.

...they feel compelled to upgrade computers about twice a year.

I was having lunch with some Wintel-only friends and was struck by the fact that they feel compelled to upgrade computers about twice a year. We were discussing the merits of Win XP and trying to determine if they should migrate a happily running Win2k box to the new operating system. As this group consists of those who love to play with computers, they all came to the conclusion that now would be a good time to replace last year's machines and simply use a preinstalled copy of Win XP.

As we talked, I tried to probe a bit further regarding what they could not do with the current systems. The consensus was absolutely nothing. The base machine for this group was a 1 GHz processor with a minimum of 512 MB of RAM and at least 40 GB of drive space. As prices have dropped on memory and drives, they have all added more than they need.

I tried to determine what is it that compels computer users to upgrade systems on a yearly basis. In corporate America, it is the software manufacturers themselves who prompt the cycle. I am sure many of you were moved from perfectly functioning older software packages because a company canceled support and forced a migration to a newer version. This migration required better hardware and the cycle continued.

Home users would seem more insulated from this forced obsolescence. Strangely, however, even my parents - who need only Web and email - just upgraded a machine simply because they were afraid to fall too far behind the current standards. They seemed to give little thought as to what they actually need to do on a daily basis.

It seems the majority of users just want new computers. This drive crosses all platforms and communities. For every Wintel friend who makes changes, I have a Mac friend who has to go from a 500 MHz PowerBook to a 667 MHz PowerBook.

To all of you, I say stop the insanity!

I know that many of you are fans of hardware, and some of you need to have the latest and greatest to accomplish your work. But for everyone who simply buys a new thing to have a new thing, slow down. Make a list of what you need in a computer. I (like many visitors to LEM) love to stay at least six months behind the curve. From that position, I can take advantage of lower cost upgrade. I recently upgraded by buying my Ti Book G4 400 at the end of its life cycle. The price was almost $900 less than I would have paid at the top of the curve, and I am very happy with its performance. I honestly could have grabbed a nice Lombard or Pismo and been just as happy with those machine from a year ago. I gain the benefit of buying after all of the bugs have been worked out of a system. You can buy accessories and even systems from users who are moving on and save a tremendous amount of money.

When I buy computer games, I usually wait until the game has been out for a few months. Again, I gain the benefit of a better price and do not have to suffer through the typical patching cycle. With productivity software, I again let the early adopters work out the problems, and then I purchase. This strategy has served me well over the years and has kept my bank account from suffering too terribly.

In closing, adopt the philosophy of LEM and use what works until you can no longer accomplish your task. Then buy only what you need. Computer technology you underutilize is simply wasted.

Join us on Facebook!

Links for the Day

• Mac of the Day: Macintosh Portable, introduced 1989.09.20. The nearly 16 lb. behemoth was innovative but not a smashing success.
• Support Low End Mac

Recent Content

• Fix Home Button Delay, Tablet the Ultimate Mobile PC, iPad Notebook a Possibility, and More, iOS News Review, 2012.02.10. Also using your iPad at work, two photo editors, a new iPad text editor, Macally's magnetic iPad 2 stand, and more.
• White MacBook Goes End-of-Life, Logitech Touch Mouse Supports Gestures, Firmware Updates, and More, The 'Book Review, 2012.02.10. Also MacBook Air better than any Ultrabook, docks for MacBook Pro models, Intel offers improved SSDs, and more.
• Mac and iOS Browsers: Options Galore, Freeware Forum, 2012.02.10. Safari is adequate on Mac and great on iOS, but the range of good alternatives is stunning. LEM writers share their favorites.
• Apple's Support Lead Shipping, Smartphones Outsell PCs, OS X Ported to ARM by Intern, and More, Mac News Review, 2012.02.10. Also the power of Tex-Edit Plus, Google and Twitter are already censoring the Web, Snow Leopard Security Update, and more.
• LogMeIn: Remote Screen Sharing for the Rest of Us, Alan Zisman, Zis Mac, 2012.02.09. Configuring the Mac's built-in screen sharing to work over the Internet can be difficult or impossible. LogMeIn makes it easy.
• 15 Years Ago Motorola Unveiled the PowerPC G3, Low End Mac Round Table, 2012.02.06. The G3 processor was optimized for real world Mac software and made a big leap forward in efficiency.
• Don't Kill Caps Lock, Learning to Love the iOS Keyboard, and an Adaptive iPad Keyboard, Charles W. Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 2012.02.06. The Caps Lock key has a useful function, the iPad's keyboard really is useful, and checking out an adaptive keyboard for the iPad.
• More links in our archive.

Recent Deals

• Best MacBook Air Deals
• Best iBook G4 Deals
• Best iPad Deals
• Best Classic Mac OS Deals
• Best Apple TV Deals
• Best 15" MacBook Pro Deals
• Best Power Mac G4 Deals
• Best Mac OS X 10.6 Deals
• More deals in our archive.

About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact

Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2012 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc. unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iPad iPhone, iMac, iPod, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.
  Advice is presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
  LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
  Email may be published at our discretion unless marked "not for publication"; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
  PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.