Virtuality: the nexus between the virtual and the real, the
place where the virtual becomes real and reality becomes virtual, a
matrix of appearances.
Adobe and Law & Order on the Mac Web- June 15, 2000
David
Schultz
Well, it's finally happened. And in a sense, we warned you. In
Beta Than Nothing I said that many times
beta testers and developers sign or agree to nondisclosure agreements
when testing and developing software. I said then to consider this
when you see pics and stories of unreleased software on rumor sites.
Something was bound to come down soon. A simple prediction. Now, a very big company, namely Adobe
is going after MacNN, which runs
AppleInsider. You know
about MacNN-AppleInsider, don't you? They were the leaders of the
Pismo and 17" iMac fiasco and idiocy at Macworld Expo in January.
That should have been enough for most to stop visiting both
sites, even when one has "News" in its title. But we'll hyphenate so
you don't get confused. I want to use this incident to motivate a larger discussion of
issues which the Mac web needs to start talking about openly. The Mac
Web needs to step up to the plate like a man and do the right thing.
Does it have the guts? We'll see. Adobe Legal Acting FastAnyway, MacNN-AppleInsider posted a story with screen shots on
Photoshop 6.0. Adobe asked for it to be taken down.
MacNN-AppleInsider refused. Or rather, MacNN-AppleInsider says that
Adobe called them on May 30 and asked that it be taken down within
twenty minutes, and MacNN-AppleInsider said they would "look into
it." What? Look into what? Anyway, Adobe threatened. MacNN-AppleInsider didn't remove the
story. Acting fast, on May 31 Adobe Systems Inc. v. Macintosh News
Network, 00-20596 was filed in U.S. District Court in San Jose,
CA. Gee whiz, why didn't MacNN-AppleInsider break that story?
They both knew about it long before we did. Don't tell me they are
selective? Do tell! If this is settled out of court, I lay down this
challenge to MacNN-AppleInsider: Publish the settlement! Make it
front page - or would that not be in the "public domain"? (See
below?) 10 to 1 they don't. Adobe requested that MacNN-AppleInsider cease disclosing trade
secrets and has asked for damages in the "tens of millions of
dollars." Adobe claims that in fact the information that
MacNN-AppleInsider released about Photoshop 6.0 was confidential
information, information which competitors would like to know.
According to Law.com,
the suit is interesting because the information was released by
someone outside of Adobe. They say, "Specifically, Adobe says the
online publication obtained a copy of the detailed feature guide for
the products and included blocks of text verbatim in its previews."
Oops! Can you say "corporate spying"? Monish Bhatia of MacNN-AppleInsider insists that the information
was in the "public domain." Yet Bhatia has yet to provide a link for
this - and probably won't until on the stand. Any "public domain" is
going to end up being a news group or Hotline, or one of their hidden
sources, which goes to show the kind of company this "news"
organization keeps. The use of the phrase "public domain" is
laughable. Public domain relates to copyright and fair use, both of
which were violated by the story and which news groups regularly
ignore. Heck, I can find plans for pipe bombs in this "public
domain."
Personally, and I speak for myself, not Low End Mac or anyone else,
so I am going to let loose here: MacNN-AppleInsider's ego got just a
bit too big, it seems. They failed to realize that it was not mom and
pop calling and asking that the story be removed, but Adobe Inc.
MacNN-AppleInsider may have thought they were bigger than Adobe, or
Adobe must not have impressed them as any kind of threat. Oh, the sin
of pride. . . .Anyway, they are just a web site, just a site that has an email
link for "rumors" and publishes what is thrown its way. It is not a
news organization. Lets get that straight. It is Jerry Springer and
"The National Inquirer" all wrapped into one. It's just a web site,
and when compared to Adobe, a multimillion dollar company, it shrinks
to its real size. You see, like it or not, with all the talk of
ecommerce, traditional main street companies are still where the real
business is. Ecommerce is still in a transitional phase. Sure, some
have made a fortune on the Internet, but Adobe is a concrete business
with business plans, well-respected products, large legal teams and
stock holders. It's not the second thought of some college computer
science major who has a web host for $19/month and $999 Compaq with a
56K modem who knows nothing about journalism standards. Why This Had to HappenAs I said, I virtually anticipated this in my
last column. It was easy: Sooner or later an NDA (nondisclosure
agreement) was to be broken against a large company with serious
lawyers, lots and lots of money, and stock holders interested in one
thing: profits. This case, if it goes to court, could spell the end
for rumor sites as we know them and could affect the Mac Web in many
ways we have only begun to think about. (Read again, "if it
goes to court.") I am rather new to the Mac Web and cannot recall
whether this kind of action has been taken before by such a large and
well-known company like Adobe. I know Apple's legal team is rather
active, as we all do. But if it works itself out in the courts, it
could bring the Mac Web to reality, something it desperately
needs. Let me explain. The immature nature of the Web, and the Mac Web in particular,
virtually preordained this, as do the kinds of actions Apple Legal
engages in. The Web, right now, is a Wild West (thanks to an early
article by Charles W. Moore for this metaphor). Rules don't apply.
It's a gunslinging, dust covered outpost for explorers. It's play and
discovery as much as business. It lacks standards - professional standards, that is. It lacks a
code of ethics. It lacks peer review of articles and stories. Deals
are made through ICQ; nothing is written. Email is the only evidence
of a promise, and the current White House email problems shows what
can go wrong with this. It's sloppy out there, believe me. The Wild Wild Web is a place
for people who don't keep clean schedules and have soccer games for
the kids. I speak of those who are really into it. Time is of the
essence: Get the story out and get it out now! (We see the same thing
on the 24/7 news channels.) Anyone can write an article. Anyone can
post an opinion. Anyone can say whatever he wants to say. Right?
Think again. The Wild Wild Web is being tamed. Lawsuits and Congress are making
sure of it. It's also the nature of Law, and I use this term in the
most abstract sense. Law is a constraint, an external constraint, on
human nature, because human nature itself either lacks a law or the
one it has is spoiled. Law brings order to things. It rights wrongs.
Its sets guidelines and limits free action. It places rules on the
game. It sets boundaries and borders where there were none. - Keep in mind I am speaking of the abstract nature of law, not
law as it is seen in our courts or in a movie like "The
Rainmaker." I mean the most general concept of law. When you
realize this, you see how lawless the Web is. I mean this, too, in
an abstract sense.
We don't like law. It's something about our nature. That's why we
cheer, literally, in the movies for the bad guys. Thinks about it.
People pull for those who get away with it, whatever "it" is. They
beat the system in the same ways we wish we could. We don't like law
sometimes. Christian theology teaches that law cannot constrain us at
all, and that we rebel against it. Where the law failed, Christ
succeeded, is the story. The point is that external constraint will
always be superficial; as long as constraint is constraint, it is
hollow. When constraint turns to character and internal moral
motives, there is nothing that can stop the law "written on our
hearts." The point for the Mac Web is that law will try to do its part, and
it will make a difference, but unless we change ourselves first, it
makes no difference. The Mac Web is disorderly and lawless, to say the least. It lacks
constraint, borders, boundaries, and rules. Like I said, it's sloppy.
Yet I happen to believe in the "invisible hand" of capitalism: It
looks sloppy and disorderly, but human nature, grounded in
self-interest and the fact that sooner or later people avoid what is
against their self-interest, will find out what works, what is best.
The human desire for quality as well as self-preservation drives
competition. Order and quality will emerge out of this disorder. It will happen on the Web sooner or later. It has to. It's a law
of nature, or human nature, or whatever you want to call it. Adobe's
is just an incarnation of this abstract regulation. If a site like
MacNN-AppleInsider thinks it can do whatever it wants because it's on
the web, the law of nature has responded, "No you can't." This holds
true even if the case is settled out of court or dropped. The message
has been sent. Nature and universal law has spoken. A Solution?Short of religious conversion, what the Mac Web needs is a code of
ethics which sites voluntarily adopt. Sites need to get serious about
their business. Some sites do this already. There are quality sites
out there. They mind their own business. They go about their work in
serious and professional ways. They don't try to race to the finish
line before everyone else, leaving a trail of journalistic mistakes
in their wake. What the Mac Web needs is a set of guidelines and standards, at
least the opinion and news sites need this. Maybe sites should adopt
something like the Society
of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics. If a site prides
itself on its journalism, then the least it can do is adopt a
professional code. It would have stopped some of the mistakes sites
make in their Mac predictions. For example, the SPJ's Code states the following: Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in
gathering, reporting and interpreting information. Journalists
should: - Test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise
care to avoid inadvertent error. Deliberate distortion is never
permissible.
- Diligently seek out subjects of news stories to give them the
opportunity to respond to allegations of wrongdoing.
- Identify sources whenever feasible. The public is entitled to
as much information as possible on sources' reliability.
- Always question sources' motives before promising anonymity.
Clarify conditions attached to any promise made in exchange for
information. Keep promises.
- Make certain that headlines, news teases and promotional
material, photos, video, audio, graphics, sound bites and
quotations do not misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or
highlight incidents out of context.
- Never distort the content of news photos or video. Image
enhancement for technical clarity is always permissible. Label
montages and photo illustrations.
- Avoid misleading reenactments or staged news events. If
reenactment is necessary to tell a story, label it."
Think about this. Testing accuracy, exercise care in avoiding
inaccuracy; identify sources where feasible, "the public is entitled
to as much information as possible on a sources' reliability,"
"always question sources' motives before promising anonymity." I
doubt these are followed on some rumor or "news" sites. In fact, I
know they are not. I and others will be talking about adopting a code of ethics for
the Mac Web in the near future. I will do so in an article at
Applelust.com within the next
few days (see A
Mac Web code of ethics: Foundations). I am serious about this.
It's about time we raise the standards on the Mac Web, and a Mac Web
Code of ethics is the place to start.
Recent Content on Low End Mac- Apple Will Not Abandon Optical Drives, the Mac Drought, Purposeful Mac Acquisition, and More, Dan Knight, Low End Mac Mailbag, 09.04.
Also Mac OS X 10.5 on a G4-upgraded Blue & White G3 and problems using a flat panel display with a Quadra 700.
- Only Leopard Runs Routine Maintenance Tasks after Startup or Waking from Sleep, Charles W. Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 09.04.
Mac OS X 10.5 runs routine system maintenance scripts as soon as possible after starting up or waking up your Mac. Earlier versions of OS X do not do this.
- Overclocking a Mac mini Got Me Hooked on Souping Up Macs, Adam Geller, My First Mac, 09.04.
Stories of hot rodding iBooks, G3 iMacs, and PCI Power Macs on the cheap.
- Tomorrow's Solid State Drives and Notebooks, Dan Knight, Mac Musings, 09.04.
Flash drives are great but have some shortcomings. Some thoughts on building better SSDs and notebooks to use them.
- 11 Mac Browsers Compared, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 09.03.
The latest versions of Internet Explorer, Opera, Safari, Shiira, iCab, Radon, Firefox, Netscape Navigator, SeaMonkey, Flock, and Camino tested in Leopard.
- Save Internet Radio, USB and Hard Drives, Hardware Manufacturers vs. Linux, and More, Dan Knight, Low End Mac Mailbag, 09.03.
Also Mac won't book after cleaning, newer versions of OS X improve wake from sleep, downgrading to OS 8.6, unreadable pages on Low End Mac, and more.
- Another Free POP3 Provider, Recharging a Dead PRAM Battery, Current Kanga Value, and More, Charles W. Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 09.03.
GMX email now available in US, Panasonic UJ-841S drive won't burn discs, restoring a dead PRAM battery in a Pismo, and thoughts on Kanga value today.
- Psystar Strikes Back, Countersues Apple, Frank Fox, Stop the Noiz, 09.03.
Psystar is trying to paint Apple as a monopoly and force it to license the Mac OS.
Latest Deals on Low End Mac- Best 12" PowerBook G4 Deals, 09.04.
Used 867 MHz Combo, no APX, $490; 1 GHz, $550; SuperDrive, $625; 1.5 GHz w/o APX, $660; w/APX, $675.
- Best Mac mini Deals, 09.04.
Used 1.25 GHz G4 SD, $549; 1.42 Combo, $409; new 1.83 Core2 Combo, $569 after rebate; 2.0 SD, $769 after rebate.
- Best 17" PowerBook G4 Deals, 09.04.
Used 1 GHz, $779; 1.33 GHz, $799; 1.5 GHz, $859; 1.67 GHz, $910.
- Best eMac Deals, 09.03.
Used 700 MHz Combo, $120; 1.25 GHz SuperDrive, $150; 1.42 GHz, $349.
- Best Mac OS X 10.5 'Leopard' Deals, 09.03.
Mac OS X 10.5, single user, $99; 5 users, $140; 10.5 Server, 10 users, $395; unlimited, $850.
- Best MacBook Air Deals, 09.03.
Refurb 1.6 HD, $1,499; new, $1,690 after rebate; refurb 1.8, $1,699; new, $1,919 a/r; refurb 1.6 SSD, $2,099; new, $2,294 a/r; refurb 1.8, $2,299; new, $2,400 a/r.
- More links in our archive.
Go to the Virtuality home page.
|
Channels
Power Macs
iMac Channel
iBook/PowerBook
MacInSchool
Computer Profiles
iMac
Power Mac
PowerBook/iBook
Performas
Mac Clones
Older Macs
Lisa • NeXT
Editorial Archive
Mac Daniel's Advice
Email Lists
LEMchat (uses
AIM)
Online Tech Journal
Consumer
advice, reviews
guides, deals
Software
Apple History
Best of the Web
Best of the Mac Web
surveys
Miscellaneous Links
Best Used Mac Buys
Used Mac Dealers
Video Cards
Mac OS X
Mac Linux
Macspeak
RAM Upgrades
About Low End Mac
Site Contacts
|
