 |
|
|
 |
||
|
||
|
||
|
|
 |
Channels
Support LEMAffiliates
|
The Truth about USB SpeedUntil May 1998, the Mac world was pretty much oblivious
regarding the Universal Serial Bus (USB) found on many Windows
computers. When Steve Jobs announced the iMac, he told the world it would have no ADB ports for the mouse and keyboard; no Mac serial ports for printers, modems, and LocalTalk; and no SCSI port for connecting external drives. Where the first Mac had two serial ports, the iMac would have two Universal Serial Bus (USB) ports. Apple was going USB, and we didn't know what to think. Although Microsoft, Intel, and their cohorts had created USB and were seeing it built into many Wintel computers, the simple fact was that USB was a bust. Nobody seemed to have any printers, modems, scanners, disk drives, game controllers, mice, keyboards, joysticks, or other devices that actually plugged into USB. Steve Jobs threw down the gauntlet. If they wanted to sell to the iMac market, they had three months to create USB devices. The USB SpecificationUSB is like ADB on steroids. Both were designed as inexpensive extensible buses, although ADB is excruciatingly slow compared to USB. Still, ADB could support up to seven devices, if they didn't require too much power. There were even ADB modems, although the were only 2400 bps. Like ADB, USB supplies power to devices, although some devices need more power than it provides. But USB goes beyond ADB: it can manage 127 devices, allows powered hubs, and lets you plug and unplug peripherals without shutting down the computer. Then there's speed. ADB was 10 kbps. Apple's serial ports supported 230.4 kbps for LocalTalk. But USB has a 12,000 kbps (12 Mbps) bandwidth. That compares favorably with almost all serial protocols, including 10 Mbps ethernet. The Real WorldThe promise is 12 Mbps throughput, but does anything actually deliver it? Thus far, the answer appears to be no. In an article about Macworld Expo last year, Henry Norr wrote, "...the sustained transfer rate for the Mac (USB) version [of the SparQ drive] will be 0.7 MB/sec. That's even slower than the parallel port version, which has a sustained rate of 0.9 MB/sec and a burst rate of 2 MB/sec." Converted to megabits per second, that put the USB SparQ drive at 5.6 Mbps - about half the rated bandwidth of USB. But then again, that's the manufacturer's specification, not a benchmark result. Things have scarcely improved since then. A member of the Retro-Talk email list reported 31 MB/min. backing up to the USB Aiwa tape drive. That's just 4.2 Mbps. (Update: See Donovan Watts' review of the Aiwa TD-UM8000 USB tape drive, which shows a 10% higher throughput of 4.7 Mbps.) A review on The iMac.com of the McPower case for turning an IDE drive into an external USB drive reported a throughput of 0.64 MBps (megabytes per second) or 5.1 Mbps. Iomega rates their USB Zip with a sustained transfer rate of 1.2 MBps or 9.6 Mbps, but no review reports nearly that throughput. A benchmark on Microtech's site shows USB performance of 163 KBps (1.3 Mbps) for the Iomega USB Zip drive and 198 KBps (1.6 Mbps) for Microtech's drive. A review of the Imation SuperDisk 2x shows sustained rates of 0.7 MBps (5.6 Mpbs), among the best speeds yet seen on USB. This also explains why reviews of USB CD-R warn against burning CDs at more than 2x speed. Going to 4x is 600 Kbps - more bandwidth than may be available on the Universal Serial Bus! (The CD-Recordable FAQ says, "USB recorders work fine at 4x when connected directly to the computer. You may need to reduce speed to 2x if you use a hub." If anyone can verify this on the Mac, Please email Dan Knight .*)
In reviewing the Que! CD-Rewritable, MacCentral noted, "Data and audio CDs can be recorded from your Mac's internal CD-ROM or DVD-ROM drive to the QUE! drive at 1x or 2x speeds only. This is due to the slow nature of the USB interface." Other reviews, linked on Que's Press Room page, note the same thing - you can't record CD-R or CD-RW reliably at 4x. Note that this is a limitation of USB, not of the Que! drive in particular. And you'll probably never see a USB DVD player. USB is only providing about 4-6 Mbps, but DVD needs more than that, over 10 Mbps. ConclusionDifferent benchmarks will yield slightly different numbers, but it's quite clear that the promised 12 Mbps performance of USB remains an unfilled promise. No real world test shows even half that throughput, whether the item being tested is a hard drive, Zip drive, SuperDisk drive, or tape drive. In the real world, consider USB a 5-6 Mbps standard for now. Perhaps future drivers will improve throughput (Apple has version 1.3 in prerelease), but for moving large quantities of data, USB is slow. The original SCSI protocol was a lot faster. The Macintosh SE could support throughput of 5.2 Mbps, about the same as USB provides today. The Mac II, introduced at the same time as the SE, supported throughput to 11 Mbps - but that was really possible. And since then, various SCSI standards and implementations have become even faster. There has been some talk of USB2, an even faster USB protocol that would be backward compatible with older USB hardware, but I don't think that's a good idea. Why not? First, because USB doesn't seem to provide promised bandwidth. Why should we expect a faster version to do any better? Second, because Apple has a better idea. FireWire currently supports bandwidths of 100, 200, and 400 Mbps - eight to 32 times faster than USB's theoretical maximum. The Blue G3 already has FireWire ports; rumors are the next iMac will, too. Instead of revising USB, which is adequate for many things, the computer industry should stick with USB as a low speed bus for input devices, floppy drives, etc., but promote FireWire for hard drives, removable media drives, tape drives, and other devices that can outpace USB. Now that we know USB's limitations, we should learn to live with
them - and move forward with FireWire as our high speed bus.
Further Reading
|
