Low End Mac's Online Tech Journal
RAM Disk or Disk Cache?
Scott L. Barber
Scott L. Barber first posted this to Quadlist. It is reprinted with his permission.
I want to rattle on about this, since Dan is testing out some of the things I've postulated about before. I keep seeing this dual RAM Disk/Disk Cache trend, and it astonishes me. I just haven't figured out why everyone wants to equate them together, and then it dawned on me - some people are using their RAM disk as their Netscape cache folder.
So, armed with this obscene information, I'm gonna make some comments . . . read on. . . .
- "With Speedometer, a cache larger than 1 MB makes very little difference."
I very much like the "With Speedometer" part of this phrase. That's a very crucial part of the sentence. Performance increases level off at 2 MB with MacBench on almost every machine, but neither MacBench nor Speedometer test normal use, they only test their own patterns. This is the difference between real world and lab world use.
- "At least on the IIsi, a RAM disk with a small cache is over twice as fast as a large data cache."
When the RAM disk is accessed, performance for those cached items from the RAM disk are exactly 50% slower because of dual checking, checking the cache and then the RAM disk. Performance drops from this point are due to latency and bus utilization. Speed Doubler fixes this by using an optimized cache routine, and I think even tells the disk cache to ignore RAM disks - but I'm not sure on the latter.
- "Don't use a RAM disk with a huge disk cache, since the OS looks to the cache first. For best response with a limited amount of data, use a large enough RAM disk with a 128KB or smaller disk cache. For more data than you'd care to put on a RAM disk, create a cache large enough to hold the whole thing if possible. (Current versions of the Mac OS limit the disk cache to 7.5 MB.)"
This really depends on why you're using a RAM disk. If you're using a RAM disk for Netscape, just can the RAM disk and raise you're cache - this eliminates the above "memory mirroring" effect. A long time ago, people started this Netscape RAM disk thing, and it's easier to just increase your disk cache by the same amount as you'd dedicated to a RAM Disk, to get the performance boost. OK . . . it's a little slower than using a RAM disk because of the SCSI checks, but again, Speed Doubler helps this a lot, and it also helps out other programs other than Netscape, and the system software as well, which can mostly be held in cache memory . . .
- "Speculation: I believe the Q2050 had a larger internal buffer than the older drive, which seems to be working against the cache. This could help explain the performance drop at 256 KB and 512 KB."
Bingo - you have an excellent grasp of how the block transfer issue affects disk cache on SCSI hard drives. There's almost a harmonic effect about it . . .
Now . . . for the notes. And I have published all these before on the list . . .
The only clients that I have ever recommended a dedicated RAM disk
to are the consistent Photoshop users, and they're told to turn their
Primary Scratch Disk to this 4 MB RAM disk. This is designed to cache,
through Adobe's unique built in VM caching routine, the first 4 MB of
their VM cache, which contains all of the cache headers, the filter
information, and all of the programing hooks that are always sent to
the hard drive, no matter how much memory you allocated to Photoshop.
- Scott L. Barber <serker@serker.com>
- Pres/CEO, SERKER Worldwide, Inc.
- Providing Hardware/Networking/Telecomm for 13 years
- Visit www.serker.com for more information
Quadlist, the listserv for users of 68040-based Macs. FAQ at <http://lowendmac.com/lists/quadlist.shtml>
Related articles
Join us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, use our Google+ page, or read our RSS news feed
Recent Online Tech Journal Columns
- Optimized Software Builds Bring Out the Best in Your Mac, 2009.06.30. Applications compiled for your Mac's CPU can load more quickly and run faster than ones compiled for universal use.
- Low End Mac's Safe Sleep FAQ, 2009.06.15. What is Safe Sleep mode? Which Macs support it? How can you enable or disable it? And more.
- The Original Macintosh, 2009.01.12. An in-depth look at the original Macintosh and how it shaped future Macs.
- More in the Online Tech Journal index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Centris 610, introduced 1993.02.10. This was the Mac we used when we started Low End Mac in 1997.
- May 24 in LEM history: 99: Mac sales up, iMac sales down? - 01: Speeding up digital photography - 02: The Internet, research, and plagiarism - 04: NewerTech TiBook battery - Optical mice from Contour - 06: Power Mac today or Intel tomorrow? - 07: G5: Apple's last fling with PowerPC - G3: From 233 MHz to 1.1 GHz
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- World Book Encyclopedia 2012 DVD, Tommy Thomas, Reviews, 2013.03.05. "You may be asking yourself, in an age of Wikipedia and instant information, is World Book still relevant?"
- Vintage Computer Festival SouthEast, April 20-21, 2013, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.25. Old Apple gear and old PCs.
- iMessage: The Ultimate Messaging Service?, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.21. In most ways, Apple's iMessage is far superior to BlackBerry Messenger.
- More links in our archive.
Recent Deals
- Best Mac mini Deals
- Best 13" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best Intel iMac Deals
- Best iPod touch Deals
- Best iPhone Deals
- Best iPod nano Deals
- Best iPod classic Deals
- Best Apple TV Prices
- More deals in our archive.
About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact
FollowLow End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Macon Facebook
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Favorite Sites
MacSurfer
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac Museum
Deal Brothers
DealMac
Mac2Sell
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ
Affiliates
Amazon.com
The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
Macgo Blu-ray Player
Parallels Desktop for Mac
eBay

