Why We Fight

What preferences power our passions for platforms (and politics)?

- Dec. 5, 2000

My Turn is Low End Mac's column for reader-submitted articles. It's your turn to share your thoughts on all things Mac (or iPhone, iPod, etc.) and write for the Mac web. Email your submission to Dan Knight .

In one of my Mac Lab Report columns, I discussed the usual arguments that fly between passionate users regarding the superiority of the Mac vs. the PC platform. However, a dispassionate outside observer might listen to such an argument and rightfully ask, "What difference does it make? Just get on with your work," and expect that to settle the matter.

Of course, it never does. The reason that people remain entrenched in the platform wars is not because one side is right or wrong. Clearly, the Mac side is correct in noting that the better integration of software and hardware from one vendor has its advantages. Yet there is just as surely a case for the economies of scale seen in the Wintel camp. The reason the fight continues is very simple and explains not only our passion for our favorite computing platform, but also our stubbornness to acquiesce in the face of ambiguous election results.

The reason the fight continues, and why you still find advocates stubbornly using older technology including Amigas and Atari STs is that we want to reassure ourselves we made a wise investment.

This is the same motivation that makes people stubbornly hang on to stocks when others sell them, keep repairing and bragging about a particular brand of vehicle past all point of reason, and certainly what motivates the lackeys of Mr. Gore and Mr. Bush to accuse each other of unfairness and even unpatriotic behavior. It is what motivates Evangelists to argue that Wintels are a hopelessly inelegant technology that no one really likes but everyone uses because they have no choice, and what motivates IT departments of large corporations to insist that they be Apple-free because it would difficult (for them) to maintain a cross-platform network.

In the case of Apple (the side I personally support, obviously), I find the arguments regarding the cost/benefit ratio, the integration of hardware and operating system (for true plug n play), and the implementation of the desktop metaphor more convincing than for the Wintel side. Even though my motivation is to demonstrate, to myself and others, that I did not spend my hard-earned money foolishly, I find there are enough compelling reasons to have made the choices I made that I can sleep well at night.

One thing keeps nagging me, however. I used many of the same arguments to justify my purchase and support of the Atari ST computing platform. At the time it was new (ca. 1987), in my view, it held many of the advantages of the Mac OS did regarding the implementation of the GUI, yet it was much cheaper and utilized a DOS-like file structure on disks. Opening a window on an Atari ST revealed a list or icon view as in a Mac. Opening a subfolder replaced the contents of the original window with the subfolder's contents, reducing the clutter of windows common for new users of the Mac OS. This is what I understand happens with OS X windows as well, although I haven't tried the beta myself.

Eventually I found myself the proud owner of a desktop computer that had no software available in any local store, no magazine support because the publishers couldn't pull a profit, and a dwindling market share. What killed Atari's desktop computer (except for those "obsessive diehards" you can still find on the Net) besides terrible marketing was that the OS was on a chip, not on the hard drive or a floppy, so the thing would boot even without a drive attached. This made upgrading the OS while being backward compatible problematic, and developers found it irritating, to say the least. I owned three different STs - some would run this piece of software, and some wouldn't, and so on. When the little irritations with the product become larger than its usefulness, people will switch, like I eventually did.

Now go back and read that paragraph again, and substitute "Mac" for "Atari".

I hope I haven't made the same mistake twice. I don't think I have. Time, Steve, and OS X will tell.

Share your perspective on the Mac by emailing with "My Turn" as your subject.

Join us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

Recent My Turn articles

Back to Mac OS 9 Because It's All I Need, 2011.01.26. Sebastian Patting sold his Intel Macs and went back to PowerPC Macs and Mac OS 9. Here's why.
Using Low End Macs for Internet Radio, 2008.08.18. When the local public radio station moved classical music to HD radio, it was time to find another way to listen. An old iMac with iTunes solved the problem.
'That's Not a Computer', 2008.07.30. Salvaging a broken PowerBook by turning it into a desktop computer.
More in the My Turn index.

Links for the Day

Mac of the Day: Mac IIfx, introduced 1990.03.19. This 'wicked fast' 40 MHz Mac trumped the 33 MHz DOS world.
February 14 in LEM history: 98: A perfect compact Mac - 00: Extended computer warranties worth the cost? - Making your PC work with your Mac - 01: Customize Microsoft Word - 02: Quadra revives a passion for computing - 03: Real world performance - DIY Pismo screen replacement - Best Mac for writing - 03: Fastest browser on the Mac - 06: 15" MacBook Pro - Impressions of a newly acquired Lisa - Finding and using free WiFi - Apple should liberate OS 9 - 07: New Mac mini cheaper than upgrading a Power Mac - 08: Falling in love with OS X
Support Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact

Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2012 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc. unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iPad iPhone, iMac, iPod, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.
Advice is presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Email may be published at our discretion unless marked "not for publication"; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.

Custom Search

Follow Low End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Mac on Facebook

Low End Mac Reader Specials

TypeStyler 11 is now in the Mac App Store!! -- Special Introductory Price of $59.95!! -- To Buy From The Mac App Store Click Here Now!! Or buy direct from Strider Software.

Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker and Mac Casino applications in minutes.

Affiliates

Amazon.com
The Apple Store
The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
GainSaver
Parallels Desktop for Mac
eBay