Darwin Source Less Than Open
My Turn is Low End Mac's column for reader-submitted articles. It's your turn to share your thoughts on all things Mac (or iPhone, iPod, etc.) and write for the Mac web. Email your submission to Dan Knight .
In Just for Fun, Linus Torvalds' recent memoir of the early days of Linux, Torvalds recounts meeting Steve Jobs and Apple technical chief Avie Tevanian.
"Basically, Jobs started off by telling me that on the desktop there were just two players, Microsoft and Apple, and that he thought the best thing I could do for Linux was to get in bed with Apple and try to get the open source people behind Mac OS X," Torvalds writes.
"Jobs made a big point of the fact that Mach's low-level kernel is open source. He sort of played down the flaw in the setup: Who cares if the basic operating system . . . is open source if you then have the Mac layer on top, which is not open source?"
Well, no one says the Mac layer has to be open, but on the other hand - if OS X is built on a free Unix, does Apple have an obligation to return something substantial to the open source community?
Legally, no, and let's face it - the goals of Apple and the Linux folks are mutually exclusive. Apple says "We have the neat stuff. Come buy it from us." Linux says "You can build the neat stuff yourself. Let us help."
However, you can argue that there's a moral obligation on Apple's part. Mach and Unix are why OS X is so stable, so Apple is profiting from open source software.
That's okay: after all, there are a number of companies profiting (or attempting to profit) from the sale of Linux. However, they don't keep big chunks of their code under lock and key.
And Apple? Apple provides the plumbing for OS X in the form of "Darwin," which is released under the company's own version of an open source license.
However, Darwin is flawed as open source. A recent posting on penguinppc.org points out, "Apple does not fully release the Darwin source into the public source. Key drivers are left out, and some workarounds for chip bugs are pulled before the public versions are made available."
The point? Penguinppc.org concludes "This keeps Linux developers from using the Darwin source as a reference."
If true, this strikes me as a shot directly at the open source folks. You can make a pretty good case for keeping the "Mac part" of OS X private: what case can you make for taking from open source and then not providing the bare minimum needed to get open source running on your hardware?
Apple is not likely to listen to such arguments, anymore than it is likely to see the foolishness of suppressing the user groups that distributed older versions of its software, but it makes the company's continuing claim to somehow being hipper, better than the rest (read: Wintel) nothing more than advertising.
Share your perspective on the Mac by emailing with "My Turn" as your subject.
Recent My Turn articles
- Back to Mac OS 9 Because It's All I Need, 2011.01.26. Sebastian Patting sold his Intel Macs and went back to PowerPC Macs and Mac OS 9. Here's why.
- Using Low End Macs for Internet Radio, 2008.08.18. When the local public radio station moved classical music to HD radio, it was time to find another way to listen. An old iMac with iTunes solved the problem.
- 'That's Not a Computer', 2008.07.30. Salvaging a broken PowerBook by turning it into a desktop computer.
- More in the My Turn index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Quadra 950, introduced 1992.05.18. Apple's huge tower has 5 NuBus slots and runs a 33 MHz 68040 processor.
- May 18 in LEM history: 92: Quadra 950 - 99: OS 8.6 more stable - 00: What can you squeeze into a compact Mac? - 01: Friendly LC 500s - Leaving Win2k behind - 05: OS X 10.4.1 update - A new PowerBook with Tiger - Tiger: Lots to like, but some annoyances - 06: 400K floppy click of death - I wish Apple were more like Microsoft - 07: 9.9% notebook market share
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- World Book Encyclopedia 2012 DVD, Tommy Thomas, Reviews, 2013.03.05. "You may be asking yourself, in an age of Wikipedia and instant information, is World Book still relevant?"
- Vintage Computer Festival SouthEast, April 20-21, 2013, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.25. Old Apple gear and old PCs.
- iMessage: The Ultimate Messaging Service?, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.21. In most ways, Apple's iMessage is far superior to BlackBerry Messenger.
- More links in our archive.
- Best Mac mini Deals
- Best 13" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best Intel iMac Deals
- Best iPod touch Deals
- Best iPhone Deals
- Best iPod nano Deals
- Best iPod classic Deals
- Best Apple TV Prices
- More deals in our archive.
Low End Mac Reader Specials
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
The Vintage Mac Museum
Mac Driver Museum
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ