 |
|
|
 |
||
|
||
|
||
Quicklinks: · Power Macs · 'Books · Early Macs · Week's Best Deals · Best Buys · OS Downloads |
|
Low End Mac Reader SpecialsDownload Typestyler, still the Ultimate Styling Tool for Internet, Print and Video Graphics. Works great in Classic with a Native OS X Version on the way. Free Tryout: www.typestyler.com
OWC: NewerTech miniStack FireWire/USB 2.0 HD & Hub Up to 1.0TB of Performance Storage + FW/USB2 Powered Hubs - convenient & sleek 6.5" x 6.5" x 1.5" Featured: 500GB $169.99; 750GB $209.99; 1.0TB $339.99 Mac users can finally play Party Poker for Mac. Not only that, they can also learn how to play PokerStars for Mac.
Compare products like desktop computers, laptops, and LCD TVs side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for a new cell phone GPS products or MP3 players. The Ciao network makes searching products easy for you.
How to Rescue the CubeOct. 5, 2000 - Dan Knight Pretty much everyone agrees on two things: the
Cube is cool and the Cube is overpriced. Cool is good. Here's how Apple can solve the price problem. Slow DownJust how fast does a computer really have to be to handle email, the Web, word processing, and all the other day-to-day tasks we use computers for? Under Mac OS 8.1 through 8.6, I've found 300 MHz is plenty of speed. With OS 9, my 333 MHz G3-upgraded SuperMac has decent performance. I'm sure the 350 MHz iMac would smoke it. The question is, what about OS X, which is where we're all headed. I'd guess a 350 MHz G4 will perform very nicely with OS X. And a 350 or 400 MHz G3 should also provide very comfortable performance. So here's the solution to Apple's price dilemma: ship a less expensive Cube. Apple has already done this with the iMac, which started at $1,299, dropped to $1,199, followed by a $999 entry-level model, which is now a $799 indigo iMac. Apple sold the Power Mac G4 in 350 and 400 MHz speeds; why not do the same with the Cube? We can use the iMac model and price schedule to give us some idea of pricing. Cube/450The base Cube has a 450 MHz G4 processor, 64 MB of memory, and ATI Rage 128 Pro video card, a 20 GB hard drive, and a DVD drive. It sells for $1,799. You can order a BTO (build to order) Cube with a 30 or 40 GB drive, more memory, and the ATI Radeon video card. Cube/500The deluxe Cube runs a 500 MHz G4 processor and ships with 128 MB RAM, the same ATI Rage card, a 30 GB hard drive, and DVD. It sells for $2,299, a $500 premium over the Cube/450. Cube/400The first and best thing Apple could do is offer a 400 MHz Cube. The speed bump from 450 to 500 MHz costs $500, but also includes memory and a larger hard drive. A 400 MHz Cube would obviously sell for less than the $1,799 Cube/450 and the $1,599 Power Mac G4/400. Exactly how much less? Good question. The 400 MHz iMac sells for $999, which is $300 less than the 450 MHz iMac. But the 500 MHz iMac sells for only $200 more than the 450 MHz model, probably because both have DVD drives, while the slower iMacs have CD-ROM. Let's choose $300 as a reasonable difference, since the G4 is a somewhat more expensive processor. The Cube/400 could sell for maybe $1,499 with a 10 GB hard drive. At least it would be less expensive than the more expandable Power Mac G4/400. Cube/350As noted above, 350 MHz is a very reasonable computer speed. Apple sells the iMac at 350 MHz and also had a 350 MHz Power Mac G4 until mid-February. If they wanted to offer a very economical Cube, they could use the 350 MHz CPU, the same 7 GB drive used with the entry-level iMac, and CD-ROM instead of DVD. Put it all together, and Apple should be able to strip another $300 from the price of the Cube/400, making the Cube/350 a $1,199 steal. Does It Make Sense?If I didn't think so, I wouldn't propose it. In fact, I'd go one step further and suggest Apple reduce the price of the current Cubes by $100 to help reduce the perceived price premium over the 400 MHz Power Mac. This would yield the following lineup:
I'd be sorely tempted to ditch my SuperMac S900, a model designed six years ago and running out of room for upgrades, in favor of the Cube/350. For the money I'd have a faster processor on a faster bus, a much better video card, a lot less noise (the S900 has two fans), drop-dead good looks, and the ability to run Mac OS X. I think a lot of Mac and clone users are in the same boat. We've used our PCI Power Macs for years, pushed them close to the limit, and are about ready to upgrade to current technology. For $1,200 or so, a lot of us would find a way to swing it. But there are other advantages to this lineup, advantages for Apple's bottom line.
By offering at least one lower-cost Cube model, Apple would radically change the perception of the Cube as an overpriced techno-toy. The Cube is in many way an attractive upgrade to current Mac owners, but the cost of entry is simply too high for a lot of us low-end users. But the question remains, will Apple make the Cube both cool and affordable? Follow up: Read Letters on Rescuing the Cube. <this article available in a printer-friendly version> Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar. Recent Mac Musings
Recent Content on Low End Mac
Have a question?
|
Overpriced
is bad.
