Low End Mac Reader Specials

TypeStyler For Mac OS X is Now Shipping! Download The Free Fully Functional 60 Day Tryout at www.typestyler.com

Poker Mac Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker application such as Full Tilt Poker Mac.

Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.

Compare products like desktop computers, apple laptops, apple macs, and LCD Monitors side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for new mobile phones, sat nav systems, or MP3 players. The Ciao online shopping community makes searching products easy for you.

Mac Musings

How McCain Won Michigan

Dan Knight - 24 February 2000 - Tip Jar

Going into Tuesday's primary election in Michigan, pollsters were calling it a dead heat between George W. Bush and John McCain.

Yet by 08.30, only half an hour after the polls closed, ABC News called the election in McCain's favor. Their analysis of exit polls showed the following:

% of Voters Bush McCain Other
Republicans 47% 65% 28% 7%
Independents 35% 28% 65% 7%
Democrats 18% 11% 80% 9%

Yes, Michigan has an open primary. That allows Democrats to vote in a Republican primary, and vice versa. It also allows those of use without a fixed party affiliation to vote. (I've campaigned for both Democrats and Republicans in the past. In 1980, I voted for John Anderson.)

Some might say open primaries skew the system, since people can vote for a weaker candidate of the opposing party. But in Michigan that's not a big deal - we've always had a strong group of moderates who refuse to embrace either party label. I think an open primary is more fair to those who have no party affiliation or are disillusioned with the party they usually support. I also believe it is more representative of potential outcome in November, especially when the field has essentially narrowed to two candidates.

(No, I haven't forgotten Alan Keyes. However, at this point in the process, he is no longer a viable candidate. Maybe he'll get the vice presidential nomination.)

Michigan is strongly Democrat in the Detroit, Flint, and Ann Arbor side of the state, where unions and University dominate. Republicans dominate most of the rest of the state. For as long as I can remember, we've sent one Democrat to the Senate and one Republican. It's the independents who make the difference in close Michigan elections - and it's the independents who helped McCain defeat George W.

Despite (or perhaps because of) strong support by the Michigan Republican Party and Governor Engler, Bush didn't carry the day. Two-thirds of traditional Republicans supported him, but the independent and Democrat participation in the primary showed the Texas governor doesn't have broad support outside his party. Come the November election, that will count for more than Republican support.

Why? Because over 90% of Republicans are going to vote the party ticket, whether that's Keyes, Bush, or McCain. That pretty much assures that the Republican candidate will take 40-45% of the vote in November.

Likewise, almost all self-identified Democrats will vote the party line for Gore or Bradley. That's a safe 40-45% for the Democratic presidential nominee.

Here in Michigan, it will be the independents who make the difference in November. Given the choice between the conservative Bush and the moderate McCain, two-thirds chose McCain on Tuesday. Given the choice between a conservative Republican and a liberal Democrat in November, it could go either way.

But given the choice between a moderate Republican and a liberal Democrat, Michigan is likely to swing Republican in November.

There are two issues at stake: party support and popular support. People like Barry Goldwater, George McGovern, and Michael Dukakis have had the backing of their parties, but their extreme positions drove the independent voters (and sometimes members of their own parties) into the other camp.

I see the American electorate as distributed along a bell curve. There are a few arch-conservatives and a few flaming liberals. There are more "regular" conservatives and liberals. And there are a lot of moderate, middle-of-the-road people who vote the candidate, not the party.

What happens in each election is that each candidate finds a point on the political spectrum. For the more conservative candidate, pretty much everyone to the right of his views will get his vote. For the more liberal candidate, pretty much those to her left will get her vote.

The question is how the voters in between will vote. For the sake of simplicity, let's assume you can draw a line midway between the more conservative candidate and his more liberal opponent. Voters on the right side of that line will almost invariable vote for the more conservative candidate; those on the left, for the more liberal one.

That means the best strategy for winning in November is running a candidate as close to the center as possible, since he is then likely to carry the broad center of the political spectrum against a strongly conservative or liberal opponent. Unless a strong third option becomes available, that should be enough to predict the election.

Let's say 0 represents the arch-conservative and 10 the flaming liberal. George W. is maybe a 2, McCain a 4. Gore and Bradley are probably in the 7-8 range (I really haven't followed the Democrats this year). If the November election is between Bush and a 7.5 Democrat, the midpoint between their views is 4.75, so the middle will swing just enough to elect the Democrat.

But if McCain runs against even a 7.0 Democrat, the midpoint moves toward the left at 5.5, moving enough of the middle to McCain to assure a Republican victory.

Of course, this model oversimplifies to an extreme. I assume a bell curve distribution of voters centered on 5.0, which may not be the case. If the curve is skewed toward the right, Bush could win. If the curve is weighted toward the left, Gore or Bradley could pull off a victory over McCain.

In the end, broad popular support means more for the Republican agenda (getting their man in the White House) than strong party support. In fact, it could easily be argued that the stronger the party support, the more likely the candidate holds more extreme views than the general public, and the more difficult it will be to gain support from the broad center.

Of the major candidates offered by the major parties, not only do I like McCain and his politics, but I believe he is the most electable candidate because of his moderate position on most issues (he usually falls between Bush and the Democrats).

It seems a lot of Michigan voters, especially the important independents, agree with me. LEM

Further Reading

Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.

Recent Mac Musings

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2009 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
  LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
  Access our RSS news feed at http://lowendmac.com/feed.xml.
  Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
  PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.
  Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iBook, iMac, eMac, iPod, iPhone, PowerBook, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.

Custom Search

Amazon.com

Navigation

Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Video Cards
Email Lists

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
   Museum
DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
   Mac FAQ
Abandonware
   Petition
Mac vs. PC Info

Affiliates

The Apple Store
Mac Connection
B&H
MacMall
TechRestore
ExperCom
Crucial Memory
batteries.com

Advertise

All of our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For price quotes and advertising information, please contact at BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number is for advertising only.

Open Link

Problems viewing this page with Internet Explorer 5.5 or 6? It works fine in other browsers, including IE 7. We recommend Firefox for those using Windows, as it is standards based and more secure than IE 6 (and earlier). More LEM visitors use Firefox than any other browser.