Mac Musings
Intel's Promise Fulfilled: More Processing Power per Processor Cycle
Dan Knight - 2009.06.30 - Tip Jar
Popularity: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Short link: http://bit.ly/FwmLN
An interesting thing has happened since Apple transition to Intel CPUs: Consumer notebooks have moved backward in raw CPU speed yet offer better overall performance.
Geekbench is a benchmark program designed to measures CPU and memory performance. (Geekbench doesn't measure video or hard drive performance.) As processor architecture has improved, as the level 2 (L2) cache has changed size, and as the memory bus has increased in speed, scores have risen to the point where today's 13" 2.23 GHz MacBook Pro (more prosumer than pro or consumer) offers the same level of performance as the Late 2008 2.4 GHz Unibody MacBook despite a 9% difference in CPU speed.
3 Years of Progress
Moving from the original 1.86 GHz Core Duo MacBook to the 1.86 GHz Core 2 Duo version in Late 2006, Geekbench reports a 3.3% higher score. That's due to processor architecture alone, as specs were otherwise identical.
At the 2.0 GHz mark, we see some anomalies: The Late 2008 Unibody model is faster than the Late 2007, which in turn is faster than the Late 2006, yet the Early 2009 MacBook White lags behind the Late 2007 model.
What's going on there?
- The Late 2006 MacBook has a 4 MB cache and uses a 667 MHz memory bus.
- The Late 2007 MacBook has a 4 MB cache and uses an 800 MHz memory bus.
- The Late 2008 Unibody has a 3 MB cache and uses a 1066 MHz memory bus.
- The Early 2009 MacBook has a 3 MB cache and uses an 800 MHz memory bus with a 1066 MHz system bus.
The combination of the same CPU speed, the same memory bus, and a smaller L2 cache is what puts the 2.0 GHz MacBook White behind the 2007 model.

Promise fulfilled: Intel CPUs are providing more processing power per
CPU cycle.
There are some other interesting results:
- The 2.1 GHz Early 2008 MacBook outscores the 2.16 GHz Late 2006 model. The difference: A smaller cache in the CPU but a faster system bus and Intel's "Santa Rosa" chipset.
- The 2.13 GHz Early 2009 MacBook outscores the 2.2 GHz Late 2007 model. My guess is that this is due to the switch to Nvidia GeForce 9400M graphics, which I speculate puts less demands on the CPU.
- The 2.26 GHz Mid 2009 MacBook Pro matches the 2.4 GHz Late 2008 model, which was only slightly faster than the 2.4 GHz Early 2008 one. (The 2.53 GHz build-to-order 13" MBP scores 3436, about 9.5% faster than the new 2.26 GHz model.)
Frankly, I was stumped by the last one: Same memory bus, same cache size, same basic design, although Apple did add FireWire and an SD Card slot. How could an 9% slower CPU provide the same performance?
Part of it comes from moving from an 800 MHz memory bus to 1066 MHz, but that doesn't account for everything.
Primate Labs gave me part of the answer on its Mac Benchmarks page, which reports exactly which Intel CPU each model uses. The Late 2008 MacBook uses the Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 ("Montevina"), but the Pro model uses the P7550. Both are part of the same "Penryn 3M" family.
And then I noticed a second entry for the 2.26 MHz MacBook Pro, but with an Intel P8400 CPU. This one scored 3126 - virtually identical to the 2.4 GHz Early 2008 MacBook. Curious. Did Apple change CPUs early in the production run?
Whatever the case there, it's evident that Intel has been improving the computing efficiency of its CPUs. You can't predict performance based on CPU speed alone, as there have been architectural improvements going from Core Duo to Core 2 Duo to today's further improved Core 2 Duo processors. You don't have to improve raw clock speed to improve performance.
This time it looks like Intel itself has disproved the Megahertz
Myth.
Join us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.
Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.
Recent articles by Dan Knight
- Kill Caps Lock, but Leave the Rest of My Keyboard Alone (Mostly), 2012.02.03. It's too easy to hit Caps Lock by accident, but why change a keyboard layout that billions of users are comfortable with?
- Is This RIM's Macintosh Moment?, 2012.01.25. In 1996, Apple was in dire straits, but Steve Jobs redefined the company. Now it's do or die time for RIM.
- Saying Good-bye to Inkjet Printers, 2012.01.18. Apple has discontinued its $100 printer rebates, but even a free inkjet printer is false economy.
- More in the Mac Musings index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Macintosh IIcx, introduced 1989.03.07. The first compact modular Mac, essentially a 3-slot Mac IIx, was a big hit.
- February 9 in LEM history: 2000: Think choices - Promoting the Macintosh - 2001: Apple vs. Mac clones - 2005: Apple and the $100 laptop - Yojimbo - Core Duo vs. G5 - 2007: The story behind After Dark - Microsoft Office 2007
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- 15 Years Ago Motorola Unveiled the PowerPC G3, Low End Mac Round Table, 2012.02.06. The G3 processor was optimized for real world Mac software and made a big leap forward in efficiency.
- Don't Kill Caps Lock, Learning to Love the iOS Keyboard, and an Adaptive iPad Keyboard, Charles W. Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 2012.02.06. The Caps Lock key has a useful function, the iPad's keyboard really is useful, and checking out an adaptive keyboard for the iPad.
- Time to End 13" MacBook Pro?, Refurb MacBook Air from $699, Enable TRIM in OS X, and More, The 'Book Review, 2012.02.03. Also Auro Pro Express SSD upgrades for 2010/11 MacBook Air, Sleipnir browser syncs bookmarks with iOS, Prey laptop recovery tool, and more.
- Apple Refurbs a Great Deal, iOSificiation a Fundamental Shift for Apple, and More, Mac News Review, 2012.02.03. Also IT workers embracing Apple, battery-free wireless mouse, freeware alternatives to commercial apps, and more.
- Does iOS Doom the Mac?, Apple Again #1 Smartphone Vendor, Massive 16 iPad Charger, and More, iOS News Review, 2012.02.03. Also Sleipnir browser lets you share links locally, iPro brings Schneider lenses to iPhone 4, and more.
- 25 Years of AppleShare Networking, Low End Mac Round Table, 2012.02.02. Macs have always had built-in networking, but Apple didn't have server software for Macs until 1987.
- Disk Expert Helps You Find and Delete or Archive Your Biggest Files, Steve Watkins, The Practical Mac, 2012.02.02. If your hard drive, flash drive, or SSD is filling up, Disk Expert can help pinpoint the biggest files, which you may be able to delete or archive.
- More links in our archive.
Recent Deals
- Best MacBook Air Deals
- Best iBook G4 Deals
- Best iPad Deals
- Best Classic Mac OS Deals
- Best Apple TV Deals
- Best 15" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best Power Mac G4 Deals
- Best Mac OS X 10.6 Deals
- More deals in our archive.
About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact
Follow
Low End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Mac
on Facebook
Low End Mac Reader Specials
TypeStyler 11 is now in the Mac App Store!! -- Special Introductory Price of $59.95!! -- To Buy From The Mac App Store Click Here Now!! Or buy direct
from Strider Software.
Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker and Mac Casino applications in minutes.
Favorite Sites
MacSurfer
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac Museum
DealMac
Deal Brothers
Mac2Sell
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ
Affiliates
Amazon.com
The Apple Store
The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
GainSaver
Parallels Desktop for Mac
eBay

