Mac Musings

Save the G3s: The Case for G3 Support in OS X 10.5 'Leopard'

Dan Knight - 2006.08.22 - Tip Jar

There's been quite a bit of discussion online recently about the future of G3 support in OS X. It looks likely that Apple won't be supporting any G3 Macs with Mac OS X 10.5 "Leopard".

Ouch, that's quite a number of old Macs to eliminate from the upgrade cycle. The oldest G3 Macs, the "Kanga" PowerBook G3 and the beige Power Mac G3, were introduced in November 1997. The last G3 Mac, the 900 MHz iBook, was discontinued in October 2003.

Apple has already dropped support for some G3 models. Kanga has never been officially supported. Beige G3s and WallStreet PowerBooks were only supported through 10.2.x, and tray-loading iMacs and the "Lombard" PowerBook were among the models dropped when 10.4 "Tiger" came out.

I've already made the case (see Mac OS X 10.5 'Leopard': Which Macs Should Make the Cut?) that Apple should support as many old Macs as possible. The only models I can make a case for dropping are the 300-466 MHz clamshell iBooks, and that only because the 800 x 600 display is impractical these days.

The Case for the Cut

Mac OS X has grown over the years, becoming more powerful and requiring more power, particularly for graphics processing. There are features that require a certain amount of video memory, and Macs with less fare poorly in comparison. But they still work.

That said, I have a couple tray-loading iMacs (400 MHz and 500 MHz) with upgraded RAM, and while they run decently with Mac OS X 10.3.x ("Panther), they feel very bogged down with Tiger. That's with 512 MB of RAM and 10.4.7 on a 7200 rpm hard drive in a FireWire enclosure. Panther on the internal drive works better.

I think we can make the case that the user experience suffers when you install a too new OS on an older computer with insufficient RAM, a slow CPU, poky graphics, and an old hard drive. This applies to the classic Mac OS, Windows, and OS X.

I have a 400 MHz PowerBook G4 that runs Tiger comfortably, but it felt faster with Panther. I don't anticipate putting Leopard on it next year. I do plan on putting it on my 1.25 GHz eMac and my 1 GHz dual Power Mac G4.

Maybe a realistic cutoff for Leopard will be anything slower than a 700 MHz G3, 550 MHz single G4 or 400 MHz dual G4. 512 MB is a very realistic minimum, and OS X will always benefit from more RAM. Dropping support for Macs with less than 16 MB of VRAM might also be realistic.

This would allow Apple to continue support for the more recent G3 models, especially the 700 MHz "summer 2001" iMac G3 and the faster G3 iBooks. I think it's realistic to support 6-year-old Macs on the trailing edge when Leopard ships in 2007.

A Modest Suggestion

I'd like to see Apple continue to support G3 Macs - and to make it clear that Leopard will be very demanding of older hardware. Maybe they could package it with minimum hardware requirements and suggested hardware requirements:

  • 400 MHz G3 minimum; 700 MHz G3 recommended
  • 512 MB minimum; 768 MB recommended
  • 16 MB video RAM minimum; 32 MB recommended

And so forth, allowing those with older iMacs, iBooks, and the like to continue buying OS upgrades without having to fiddle with third-party installers.

A Little Advice

Mac users have been debating the optimal OS since the System 7 era, when we had to choose between the flat out speed of System 6.0.x or the flexibility of System 7 (or 7.1, 7.5.x, or 7.6.1). I lean toward features, while others lean toward speed. It's a question of which efficiency - helpful features vs. raw power - best fits your needs.

I'd suggest that Apple was pretty realistic in dropping support for the beige G3 and WallStreet PowerBooks with 10.3. While you can install it with XPostFacto, unless you've upgraded the CPU, maximized RAM, and put in a faster hard drive, you'll find Panther fairly sluggish.

Likewise, running Tiger on a 500 MHz iMac with 512 MB of RAM works, but I feel that it's passed the tipping point between adding great new features and bogging down the computer. Panther works very nicely, though.

It's going to be the same thing with Leopard. There will be Macs that can run it, but hands on experience will show you were better off with Tiger - or maybe even Panther. (Although I use Tiger on all of my G4 Macs, I suspect that Panther had all the features I really needed, and I know it ran more smoothly.)

Don't go too far with your OS upgrades. A Mac Plus can run 7.5.5, but most users will be happier with 6.0.x or 7.1. A PowerBook 1400 can run 9.x, but 8.1 or 7.6.1 will run a lot more smoothly. A 900 MHz iBook G3 will probably be able to run Leopard, but it might not be the optimal operating system for it.

Still, I'd like to see Apple give as many of us as possible the opportunity to officially install and use Leopard on our Macs. And cutting off all G3 Macs would definitely be going too far. LEM

Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.

Recent Mac Musings

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2008 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
  LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
  Access our RSS news feed at http://lowendmac.com/feed.xml.
  Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
  PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.
  Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iBook, iMac, eMac, iPod, iPhone, PowerBook, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.


Have a question?
Ask an expert!

Navigation

Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Best Used Macs
Video Cards
Email Lists
InfoMac's Low
End Mac Forum

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
   Museum
DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
   Mac FAQ
Abandonware
   Petition
Mac vs. PC Info

Affiliates

The Apple Store
Mac Connection
MacMall
TechRestore
MacResQ
ExperCom
Crucial Memory
batteries.com

Advertise

All of our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For price quotes and advertising information, please contact at BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number is for advertising only.

Open Link

Problems viewing this page with Internet Explorer 5.5 or 6? It works fine in other browsers, including IE 7. We recommend Firefox for those using Windows, as it is standards based and more secure than IE 6 (and earlier). More LEM visitors use Firefox than any other browser.