Mac Musings

Mac Sales Off: Why Macintel and PowerPC Are Hard to Sell Today

Dan Knight - 2006.01.26 - Tip Jar

Low End Mac Reader Specials

Memory To Go Special: MacPro 8 Core Memory 4GB kit $154 / 2GB kit $94, New 2008 iMac 2GB $46. MacBook Pro / MacMini / iMac Intel Core2 DUO 2GB $44 / 1GB $23--Free shipping available.

Download Typestyler, still the Ultimate Styling Tool for Internet, Print and Video Graphics. Works great in Classic with a Native OS X Version on the way. Free Tryout: www.typestyler.com

LA Computer Company: Specials on AppleCare, iMac's, Apple Batteries and Apple A/C Adapters. Also Great prices on Used Apple Computers. Call 1-800-941-7654 Click Here.

OWC: NewerTech miniStack FireWire/USB 2.0 HD & Hub Up to 1.0TB of Performance Storage + FW/USB2 Powered Hubs - convenient & sleek 6.5" x 6.5" x 1.5" Featured: 500GB $169.99; 750GB $209.99; 1.0TB $339.99

Mac users can finally play Party Poker for Mac. Not only that, they can also learn how to play PokerStars for Mac.

Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.

Compare products like desktop computers, laptops, and LCD TVs side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for a new cell phone GPS products or MP3 players. The Ciao network makes searching products easy for you.

New iMac 800Mhz Memory 4GB $98, 2GB $50. Click to Maximize your Macs...

If the folks at Think Secret are right, sales of the Macintel iMac are below Apple's expectations - and iMac G5 and PowerBook G4 sales are off as well.

This does not bode well for Apple.

With promises of 2x to 4x the performance of their predecessors, you'd think the new iMacs would be flying off the shelves and MacBook Pro preorders would be piling up like leaves beneath an oak tree in the fall.

What Went Wrong?

In terms of selling off old inventory, Apple really blew it by keeping prices of the iMac G5 and 15" PowerBook G4 unchanged after claiming the new iMac was twice as fast as the old one - and the new MacBook Pro four times as fast as the PowerBook G4.

Whether these claims can be substantiated in the real world or not (and thus far it appears that they cannot), it puts Apple in the unenviable position of trying to sell two similar computers at the exact same price while claiming the 2006 models are significantly faster than the 2005 ones.

Not smart. In our estimation nothing less than a 20% price cut, and preferably a 30% one, will be enough to get the old PowerPC iMacs and PowerBooks out the door.

PowerPC Benefits

There are only two areas where the older Macs have an advantage over the new Macintel models.

  1. PowerPC Macs can all run Classis mode; Intel Macs cannot.
  2. PowerPC Macs run PowerPC apps more quickly than Intel Macs can with their Rosetta emulation.

The first point won't be a big consideration for new switchers, but it's a big factor for longtime Mac users, including several of Low End Mac's writers. For those of us still content with Claris HomePage, Photoshop 5.5, Claris Emailer, or other "classic" apps, no Classis on Macintel is a stumbling block - if not an outright deal breaker.

Just as 680x0 emulation on Power Macs paved the way for Mac users to transition from 680x0-based Macs to PowerPC-based ones, Rosetta makes it possible for OS X users to migrate to Intel-based Macs without losing access to (most of) their OS X apps.

The problem with emulation is performance. While a few programs won't work under emulation, the bigger drawback is that PowerPC code run under Rosetta needs on average 50% more memory and tends to run at 50-70% of their speeds on a PowerPC Mac.

For those who need performance and have to use either Classic mode or programs that have not yet been ported to Intel, there's a good reason to stick with PowerPC Macs.

Macintel Benefits

Simply because the Intel Core Duo processor has two cores, the new Macintel models should offer roughly twice the CPU performance of the G4 and G5 Macs they replace, all other architectural considerations aside.

With Intel-native apps (a.k.a. Universal Binaries), the Intel iMac and MacBook Pro really demonstrate their potential. Every field report shows that an Intel Core Duo outperforms a single-core G4 or G5 at the same clock speed with Intel-native software.

But none of the benchmarks demonstrate twice the power across the board, let alone the 4x Apple claims for the MacBook Pro. The Intel Macs average one-third to 2.5x as fast depending on the task, but overall the average less than twice the overall performance.

That means that everyone was right to take Apple's claims with a shaker or two of salt. Abstract floating point and integer benchmarks are not predictors of real world performance, and when people hear "twice as fast" they assume it means the whole experience, not just certain CPU functions.

Still, in the long run the Intel Macs are going to smoke the PowerPC Macs, but that depends on having native-code apps. It will be months before most serious apps are available as universal binaries, and buyers do well to wait for their most important apps (perhaps Photoshop) to get ported over to the new hardware and avoid the emulation slowdown.

Hard Sell Both Ways

It's a tough sell for Apple. People are skeptical about the new Intel Macs, which promise a lot but are unproven. Making extravagant performance claims only makes us more skeptical, making the Intel Macs a harder sell.

While realizing that the Intel Macs will eventually offer significant performance gains, Mac users see the older PowerPC Macs selling for the same price they had before the Expo. What's up with that? How can Apple believe they'll have significant sales of "last year's architecture" now that the Intel Macs are out with Apple's promises of huge performance gains?

Mac users and potential switchers can be excused for not jumping on the new platform, since their most important apps may not yet be available. And they can be excused for holding off on the iMac G5 and PowerBook G4, since they offer less overall performance than the Macintel models that replace them at exactly the same price.

The Solution

To move the PowerPC inventory, Apple has to do what car makers do at the start of the new model year - blow out the old stuff at reduced prices. A 20% price cut would be a good start considering the extravagant claims made for the Macintels.

To get people to adopt the 2006 Macs, Apple needs to put some pressure on Adobe, Microsoft, Quark, and others to get their mission critical apps ported over to Intel architecture. The longer we go with Photoshop, Microsoft Office, Quark, and other crucial apps unavailable as universal binaries, and the longer Mac users have to choose between full speed on PowerPC Macs or slower emulated performance on Macintel models, the longer it's going to take for the Intel Macs to take off.

Even Apple's pro apps won't be available until some time in March, further reducing any reason for people who use them to go Intel now instead of when the apps they use are finally available.

It's a good thing Apple is coming off their best year and best quarter ever, because the mixed messages of the Intel transition are going to plague them for this entire quarter, if not the first half of the calendar year.

Then again, we can be sure that iPod sales will take up the slack. LEM

Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.

Recent Mac Musings

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2008 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
  LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
  Access our RSS news feed at http://lowendmac.com/feed.xml.
  Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
  PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.
  Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iBook, iMac, eMac, iPod, PowerBook, MacBook, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.


Have a question?
Ask an expert!

Navigation

Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Best Used Macs
Video Cards
Email Lists
InfoMac's Low
End Mac Forum

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
   Museum
DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
   Mac FAQ
Abandonware
   Petition
Mac vs. PC Info

Affiliates

The Apple Store
Mac Connection
MacMall
TechRestore
MacResQ
ExperCom
Crucial Memory
batteries.com

Advertise

All of our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For price quotes and advertising information, please contact at BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number is for advertising only.

Open Link

Problems viewing this page with Internet Explorer 5.5 or 6? It works fine in other browsers, including IE 7. We recommend Firefox for those using Windows, as it is standards based and more secure than IE 6 (and earlier). More LEM visitors use Firefox than any other browser.