Mac Musings

Apple Selling Pentium-Based Macs? Don't Count on It

Dan Knight - 2005.06.06 - Tip Jar

Popularity: LEMLEMLEMLEM

Tweet this! Digg it! Reddit Del.icio.us Short link: http://bit.ly/fVxWFJ

Yes, just hours before Apple announced it would be switching the Mac to Intel x86 CPUs, we argued that it would make no sense for Apple to do so. Thanks to dual-core technology and a great PowerPC emulator, Apple was able to make the transition far more smoothly than we would have believed. Would you expect less from Apple?

For the past week, the Mac Web and some of the mainstream press has been abuzz with rumors of Apple selling Intel-based Mac OS X computers. At Low End Mac, we think the idea is ludicrous.

It's not that Apple can't port OS X to other hardware. Apple has been porting the Mac OS to Intel hardware since the unreleased "Star Trek" project back in the System 7 era. There's no technical reason it can't be done.

It's not that I think Intel processors are inferior to the PowerPC processors produced by IBM and Freescale. Intel didn't become number one by marketing second-rate chips. I suspect that OS X on a Pentium 4 would perform very nicely in comparison to a Power Mac G5 system.

And it's not that Apple couldn't create an Intel-based computer running OS X. There is no technical reason not to do so - but there are some very good marketing reasons that argue against Apple producing a Pentium-based Macintosh.

First and foremost, it would confuse the market. Today you can buy Mac software - even apps written for the 68030 and System 7 - and run them on Apple hardware. Unless Apple has a phenomenal PowerPC emulator, running existing Mac titles on an Intel CPU is probably going to be slow. Very slow. Painfully slow.

That would be a deterrent for current Mac users to make the switch. Their old software would come to a crawl in emulation, just as Windows software crawls on Virtual PC.

Just imagine the frustration of someone buying a MacIntel and not being able to find any native software for it. The only programs, other than Apple's own titles, would only be available in PowerPC versions until Microsoft, Adobe, and others port them over to the new CPU.

Apple has a long, strong track record with the PowerPC, and I just can't see changing horses midstream. By the end of the year, IBM should be able to provide 3.2 GHz and faster G5 processors, and Freescale has been developing faster G4s for the low-end of the Apple line.

OS X for Intel

There are other routes Apple and Intel could take. One possibility is that Intel has signed on to produce PowerPC chips, giving Apple a second source. They need that, because IBM just can't make G5s fast enough for Apple to move more of their line to the new CPU. If Intel could produce G4 and/or G5 processors at 1.5 GHz to 3.5 GHz, Apple might be able to release that PowerBook G5. You know, the portable called "the mother of all thermal challenges" because of the heat the G5 generates.

Possibility two is that Apple will port OS X over to Intel processors, license the OS to various PC vendors (perhaps HP and Gateway), and create a new hardware platform the doesn't run Windows but is Pentium-based. The advantages: no viruses, no spyware, no adware, the elegance of OS X, and the ability to emulate Windows at full speed (and perhaps kill off the market for Virtual PC). The disadvantages: no software yet for the new platform, difficulty of selling a new platform that's neither Macintosh nor Windows PC.

In fact, this could be the new standard OS for 64-bit Intel (and probably Athlon) machines. I think there's a real market there - and Apple could avoid going head-to-head with Microsoft in the 32-bit PC market.

I just don't see Apple being one of the companies selling Pentium-based hardware. They could make a killing selling OS X to existing PC makers, though.

The long shot is Apple porting OS X to existing Intel-based computers. I don't see that as very likely, since it would mean the same kind of hardware support headaches the Windows world is used to. Which video card? What drive controller? Is that a PS/2 or USB mouse?

In a few hours, Apple should put the rumors to rest.... LEM

Join us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.

Recent articles by Dan Knight

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact

Custom Search

Share

Follow Low End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Mac on Facebook

Low End Mac Reader Specials

Quantcast

TypeStyler 11 is now in the Mac App Store!! -- Special Introductory Price of $59.95!! -- To Buy From The Mac App Store Click Here Now!! Or buy direct from Strider Software.

Quantcast

Quantcast

Quantcast

Poker Mac Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker and Mac Casino applications in minutes.

Quantcast

Quantcast

Quantcast

Quantcast

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac Museum
DealMac
Deal Brothers
Mac2Sell
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ

Affiliates

Amazon.com
The Apple Store
The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
GainSaver
Parallels Desktop for Mac
eBay

Low End Mac's Amazon.com store

Advertise

Open Link