Mac Musings

It's Not Apple vs. the Mac Web

Dan Knight - 2005.03.23 - Tip Jar

Low End Mac Reader Specials

Memory To Go Special: MacPro 8 Core Memory 4GB kit $154 / 2GB kit $94, New 2008 iMac 2GB $46. MacBook Pro / MacMini / iMac Intel Core2 DUO 2GB $44 / 1GB $23--Free shipping available.

Download Typestyler, still the Ultimate Styling Tool for Internet, Print and Video Graphics. Works great in Classic with a Native OS X Version on the way. Free Tryout: www.typestyler.com

LA Computer Company: Specials on AppleCare, iMac's, Apple Batteries and Apple A/C Adapters. Also Great prices on Used Apple Computers. Call 1-800-941-7654 Click Here.

OWC: OWC Mercury On-The-Go FW400/800/USB2/eSATA Portables High Performance A/V Rated, **Bus Powered** **Up to 500GB in the Palm of your Hand** Macworld Editor's Choice, CNET 'Very Good' - from $75.99!

Mac users can finally play Party Poker for Mac. Not only that, they can also learn how to play PokerStars for Mac.

Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.

Compare products like desktop computers, laptops, and LCD TVs side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for a new cell phone GPS products or MP3 players. The Ciao network makes searching products easy for you.

New iMac 800Mhz Memory 4GB $98, 2GB $50. Click to Maximize your Macs...

No, Macworld UK, it isn't Apple vs. the Mac Web (see Appeal filed in Apple v Mac Web case) as the title of your article implies. At least the article clears up the confusion, but still....

The story isn't Apple taking on the Mac Web. It's Apple trying to plug the leaks that give sites like Think Secret, AppleInsider, and PowerPage the confidential trade secret information that they've been publishing - and have those sites think twice about publishing trade secrets in the future.

Most of the Mac Web is not in the rumor-and-insider-information business. And we're far from unanimous in supporting these rumor and information sites. Yes, we all believe in the First Amendment, but whether that applies in these cases is something we disagree on.

I think most of us are of the opinion that the problem is that Apple isn't careful enough about who it discloses information to. Apple has a history of dealing with leakers, just as their lawyers have a history of doing what they can to pull information once it's been published on rumor sites, but so far it hasn't been enough of a deterrent to keep a few people from spilling the beans.

Apple claims they have exhausted all means at their disposal to identify the source of the leaked information, so the next step is to try to obtain helpful information from the very sites that published it.

The rumor sites exist only because there are leaks, so it's obviously in their self-interest to stonewall Apple, protect their sources, and stay in business. In this case, they're trying to argue that the identities of their informants should be protected by shield laws.

Apple disagrees, and so did the first judge to rule on this. Both maintain that unauthorized sharing of trade secrets is a crime and that shield laws are not meant to protect criminals.

Criminals. Think about that.

Apple is trying to identify criminals - those who traffic in trade secrets - and has to enlist the aid of those who benefit from violated nondisclosure agreements. It's pretty obvious that these sites aren't going to cough up the information without a court order, and then not until they've appealed is as far as possible.

Although the media likes to paint this as a First Amendment issue, a threat to journalists everywhere, and whether "bloggers" (as they call everyone who writes for the Web, whether in a blog or not) are journalists and protected by the First Amendment.

The simple fact is that a free press must be a responsible press. Movie stars sometimes sue the tabloids over lies. A certain SUV maker has been fighting Consumer Reports for years over tip tests.

If the information published isn't accurate, the publisher may be sued - but we're going a step beyond that in this case. Trade secrets, such as the formula for Coca Cola, have to remain secrets, and the press must have a compelling reason ("the public interest") to publish negative information about smoking, Love Canal, potentially dangerous medications, and the like.

If Think Secret, AppleInsider, PowerPage, and others wish to publish trade secrets, they need to be prepared to pay the piper.

In the end, the courts will decide how trade secrets and a free press interrelate, how criminally liable the recipients and publishers of trade secrets are, and whether shield laws apply in cases like this.

The whole Web - Mac and otherwise - is paying close attention.  LEM

Dan Knight has been using Macs since 1986, sold Macs for several years, supported them for many more years, and has been publishing Low End Mac since April 1997. If you find Dan's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.

Recent Mac Musings

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2008 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
  LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
  Access our RSS news feed at http://lowendmac.com/feed.xml.
  Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
  PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.
  Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iBook, iMac, eMac, iPod, PowerBook, MacBook, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.


Have a question?
Ask an expert!

Navigation

Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Best Used Macs
Video Cards
Email Lists
InfoMac's Low
End Mac Forum

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
   Museum
DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
   Mac FAQ
Abandonware
   Petition
Mac vs. PC Info

Affiliates

The Apple Store
Mac Connection
MacMall
TechRestore
MacResQ
ExperCom
Crucial Memory
batteries.com

Advertise

All of our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For price quotes and advertising information, please contact at BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number is for advertising only.

Open Link

Problems viewing this page with Internet Explorer 5.5 or 6? It works fine in other browsers, including IE 7. We recommend Firefox for those using Windows, as it is standards based and more secure than IE 6 (and earlier). More LEM visitors use Firefox than any other browser.