Miscellaneous Ramblings

Taste, Style, and the Mac

Charles Moore - 2001.04.13 - Tip Jar

Low End Mac Reader Specials

Memory To Go Special: New 2008 iMac 2GB $42 / iMac Intel Core2 DUO & MacBook Pro 2GB $36 - 1GB $20. MacPro 8 Core Memory 8GB kit $286 / 4GB kit $143 / 2GB kit $93 -- Free shipping available. LIfetime warranty.

Download Typestyler, still the Ultimate Styling Tool for Internet, Print and Video Graphics. Works great in Classic with a Native OS X Version on the way. Free Tryout: www.typestyler.com

LA Computer Company: Specials on AppleCare, iMac's, Apple Batteries and Apple A/C Adapters. Also Great prices on Used Apple Computers. Call 1-800-941-7654 Click Here.

OWC: Juice up your iPod w/NewerTech High Capacity Battery from $19.99 Free Installation Videos for most models. Pro Installation Service w/FedEx Shipping From $57.95 (Battery Included). - www.MacSales.com

Mac users can finally play Party Poker for Mac. Not only that, they can also learn how to play PokerStars for Mac.

Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.

Compare products like desktop computers, laptops, and LCD TVs side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for a new cell phone GPS products or MP3 players. The Ciao network makes searching products easy for you.

Style is a tricky thing to critique, because it is always to some degree in matter of taste, and there are few purposely styled objects that cannot claim a least a few aficionados, be it only the stylist and his or her mother.

However, I believe that there is such a thing as objectively good or bad taste, elitist as that may sound to some 21st century ears. For example, I would vigorously contend that Beethoven's Ninth Symphony is a much more tasteful work than Elvis Presley's "You Ain't Nothin' But A Hound Dog," both aesthetically and on the basis of its musical depth and complexity.

But it's still a tricky concept, and taste must also be inappropriate to context. Beethoven's Ninth would not be, for example, a sensible choice for the playlist at a bachelor party or beer bash, while Hound Dog or other popular ditties of the same genre would be entirely suitable.

In terms of style, and focusing in more closely on the central theme of this discussion, it would be bad taste to paint a new Bentley Arnage bright canary yellow, but that color suited a '69 Dodge Super Bee a friend of mine used to own perfectly. Context, as I said, is key.

Now this column really is about Macs, specifically my ongoing befuddlement as to how the same styling Department could turn that New iMacssomething as understatedly elegant as the G4 Cube, and as overstatedly bizarre as the "Flower Power" and "Blue Dalmatian" iMacs inside of a six month period.

As I said, context is key. Right now, by happenstance, I am looking at one of our family's towels, which has a flowered print motif not unlike that of the Flower Power iMac. It is a very attractive towel, one of my favorites, in fact, but I would not want that print decorating my computer.

One of the things that makes the Mac orbit interesting, I guess, is that you really never know what Apple will do next, but personally, I would prefer a bit more adherence to a recognizable theme, styling wise - a sort of recognizable signature look across the line - so long as they slotted settled on the right one.

For instance, IBM computers have a particular look - desktop or ThinkPad - that gives an immediately recognizable sense of coherence.

By comparison, if you take Apple's current five computer model families, aside from colors shared by some models, there is really no thematic coherence at all. An iMac looks nothing like a PowerMac looks nothing like a Cube looks nothing like an iBook looks nothing like a PowerBook. Distinctiveness is one thing, but this is chaos.

This state of affairs is not new, but it has never been as extreme as it is now.

Historically, I would rate Apple Computer styling in four categories:

  1. Attractive and/or elegant
  2. Interesting, but not really pretty or elegant
  3. Mediocre/boring - they can't really have been trying
  4. Ugleee!

There have been too many Mac models over the past 17 years to do an exhaustive breakdown, but here are what I consider the most notable examples.

1. The MacintoshAttractive and/or elegant

2. Interesting, but not really pretty or elegant

3. Mediocre/boring - they can't really have been trying

4. Twentieth Anniverary MacUgleee!

I don't doubt that there will be plenty of readers who will disagree with my choices here, but that's the way I see it, according to my sense of style and taste, if not my buying history. Of the four workhorse Macs I've owned since 1992, one was from category 1; two from category 2; and one from category 4.

Charles Moore has been a freelance journalist since 1987 and writing for Mac websites since May 1998. His The Road Warrior column is a regular feature on MacOpinion, and he is a news editor and columnist at Applelinks.com.

Recent Miscellaneous Ramblings

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts


Have a question?
Ask an expert!

Navigation

Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Best Used Macs
Video Cards
Email Lists
InfoMac's Low
End Mac Forum

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
   Museum

DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
   Mac FAQ

Abandonware
   Petition

Mac vs. PC Info

Affiliates

The Apple Store
Mac Connection
MacMall
TechRestore
MacResQ
ExperCom
Crucial Memory
batteries.com

Advertise

Open Link