The Lite Side
Microsoft the Ultimate Pyramid Scheme?
- 2005.08.03
Sometimes
the headlines just write themselves.
According to an article at the Register,
MS Website Trumpets 'Pyramid' Company, Microsoft has been
featuring a case study about GoldQuest, a pyramid scheme
company!
This, of course, is not Microsoft's fault. Companies that use
Windows to generate funds through pyramid schemes do not have to
tell Redmond what they are up to any more than purveyors of
spyware, adware, viruses, Trojan horses, networks of zombie
computers belching up personal information to Mafia lords,
spammers, or anyone else has to. These things manifestly do not
have anything to do with Microsoft per se, any more than
. . . some other analogy that I was thinking of but
forgot.
Any way, the point of this article (and I do have a point) is
that Microsoft itself is a kind of pyramid scheme.
In your classic pyramid scheme, you sell something of limited
value and tell the seller that they can make money by selling the
same valueless thing to friends for the same price less a minor
finder's fee. The "mark" is told that as more people join the
pyramid, more money trickles down the pyramid to him through the
finder's fees, eventually making him rich with very little
effort.
In the Microsoft version, the "mark" (an IT guy) is told that if
they use Windows, they'll be more compatible and more productive.
Further, if they convince 10 users in their company to use Windows,
then all the additional savings will be passed on to the IT
department, which can hire more people to take care of the
additional computers.
Managers further up the food chain know to get a budget proposal
through the executive committee. They need to include a technology
line estimating the costs of additional computers, data storage
resources, etc. required to complete a project. The IT guys clue
them into the savings they will have if they go single-platform
across the company, and the managers buy into the pyramid.
CEOs and CIOs are told not only by the managers but by the IT
staff as well how going single-platform (read: Windows) will save
them money not only for a particular project, but for the budget of
the company overall.
Funny thing is, no one ever writes a line item in a budget for
the savings. No managers ever get additional resources for these
savings, and somehow the IT staff always seems to soak up the
savings without managing to cut staff, reduce expenses, or increase
productivity.
Isn't that a pyramid scheme?
In a true pyramid scheme only the people in the first layer get
really rich. And those would be . . . umm . . .
lemme see . . . it wouldn't be the people actually
using the computers, hmm . . . not the managers
. . . not the CEO or CIO . . . hmm
. . . it would have to be . . . .
Microsoft!
Why is it, I wonder, that people always say, "They are making us
all switch to Microsoft," and never, "We are all switching to
Microsoft because we want to?"
- 2005.08.03
Sometimes the headlines just write themselves.
According to an article at the Register, MS Website Trumpets 'Pyramid' Company, Microsoft has been featuring a case study about GoldQuest, a pyramid scheme company!
This, of course, is not Microsoft's fault. Companies that use Windows to generate funds through pyramid schemes do not have to tell Redmond what they are up to any more than purveyors of spyware, adware, viruses, Trojan horses, networks of zombie computers belching up personal information to Mafia lords, spammers, or anyone else has to. These things manifestly do not have anything to do with Microsoft per se, any more than . . . some other analogy that I was thinking of but forgot.
Any way, the point of this article (and I do have a point) is that Microsoft itself is a kind of pyramid scheme.
In your classic pyramid scheme, you sell something of limited value and tell the seller that they can make money by selling the same valueless thing to friends for the same price less a minor finder's fee. The "mark" is told that as more people join the pyramid, more money trickles down the pyramid to him through the finder's fees, eventually making him rich with very little effort.
In the Microsoft version, the "mark" (an IT guy) is told that if they use Windows, they'll be more compatible and more productive. Further, if they convince 10 users in their company to use Windows, then all the additional savings will be passed on to the IT department, which can hire more people to take care of the additional computers.
Managers further up the food chain know to get a budget proposal through the executive committee. They need to include a technology line estimating the costs of additional computers, data storage resources, etc. required to complete a project. The IT guys clue them into the savings they will have if they go single-platform across the company, and the managers buy into the pyramid.
CEOs and CIOs are told not only by the managers but by the IT staff as well how going single-platform (read: Windows) will save them money not only for a particular project, but for the budget of the company overall.
Funny thing is, no one ever writes a line item in a budget for the savings. No managers ever get additional resources for these savings, and somehow the IT staff always seems to soak up the savings without managing to cut staff, reduce expenses, or increase productivity.
Isn't that a pyramid scheme?
In a true pyramid scheme only the people in the first layer get really rich. And those would be . . . umm . . . lemme see . . . it wouldn't be the people actually using the computers, hmm . . . not the managers . . . not the CEO or CIO . . . hmm . . . it would have to be . . . . Microsoft!
Why is it, I wonder, that people always say, "They are making us all switch to Microsoft," and never, "We are all switching to Microsoft because we want to?"
Join us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.
Recent Lite Sides
- You Might Be a Computer Geek If..., 2009.06.17. 20 signs that you just might possibly be a computer geek.
- What if Apple thought like a PC company?, 2007.11.01. Apple has innovated and blazed its own trail. But what if it had followed the path taken by the PC copycats?
- How Microsoft can turn Vista lemons into lemonade, 2007.10.22. How Microsoft could profit by no longer allowing manufacturers to sell new PCs with Windows XP installed.
- More in the The Lite Side index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Mac IIfx, introduced 1990.03.19. This 'wicked fast' 40 MHz Mac trumped the 33 MHz DOS world.
- February 14 in LEM history: 98: A perfect compact Mac - 00: Extended computer warranties worth the cost? - Making your PC work with your Mac - 01: Customize Microsoft Word - 02: Quadra revives a passion for computing - 03: Real world performance - DIY Pismo screen replacement - Best Mac for writing - 03: Fastest browser on the Mac - 06: 15" MacBook Pro - Impressions of a newly acquired Lisa - Finding and using free WiFi - Apple should liberate OS 9 - 07: New Mac mini cheaper than upgrading a Power Mac - 08: Falling in love with OS X
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- PowerBook 165c: 19 Years of Color to Go, Chris Carson, Building Bridges, 2012.02.14. Until 1993, all of Apple's notebook computers had black and white displays. The 165c gave us a color PowerBook for the first time.
- Mac and iOS Browsers: Options Galore, Freeware Forum, 2012.02.10. Safari is adequate on Mac and great on iOS, but the range of good alternatives is stunning. LEM writers share their favorites.
- White MacBook Goes End-of-Life, Logitech Touch Mouse Supports Gestures, Firmware Updates, and More, The 'Book Review, 2012.02.10. Also MacBook Air better than any Ultrabook, docks for MacBook Pro models, Intel offers improved SSDs, and more.
- Fix Home Button Delay, Tablet the Ultimate Mobile PC, iPad Notebook a Possibility, and More, iOS News Review, 2012.02.10. Also using your iPad at work, two photo editors, a new iPad text editor, Macally's magnetic iPad 2 stand, and more.
- Apple's Support Lead Shipping, Smartphones Outsell PCs, OS X Ported to ARM by Intern, and More, Mac News Review, 2012.02.10. Also the power of Tex-Edit Plus, Google and Twitter are already censoring the Web, Snow Leopard Security Update, and more.
- LogMeIn: Remote Screen Sharing for the Rest of Us, Alan Zisman, Zis Mac, 2012.02.09. Configuring the Mac's built-in screen sharing to work over the Internet can be difficult or impossible. LogMeIn makes it easy.
- More links in our archive.
Recent Deals
- Best 17" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best iPod classic Deals
- Best eMac Deals
- Best MacBook Air Deals
- Best iBook G4 Deals
- Best iPad Deals
- Best Classic Mac OS Deals
- Best Apple TV Deals
- More deals in our archive.
About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact
Follow
Low End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Mac
on Facebook
Low End Mac Reader Specials
TypeStyler 11 is now in the Mac App Store!! -- Special Introductory Price of $59.95!! -- To Buy From The Mac App Store Click Here Now!! Or buy direct
from Strider Software.
Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker and Mac Casino applications in minutes.
Favorite Sites
MacSurfer
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac Museum
DealMac
Deal Brothers
Mac2Sell
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ
Affiliates
Amazon.com
The Apple Store
The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
GainSaver
Parallels Desktop for Mac
eBay
