Donate ·
Amazon.com · MacResQ
· Advertise
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
|
Quicklinks: · Power Macs · 'Books · Early Macs · Week's Best Deals · Best Buys · OS Downloads |
|
Factor of 3 Rule Predicts 3 GHz G5 as Next ComputerLow End Mac Reader SpecialsMemory To Go Special: MacPro 8 Core 8GB kit $232 / 4GB kit $116 / 2GB kit $72. New Macbook 2GB DDR3-$65. HARD DRIVES available -- Free shipping / LIfetime warranty. Download Typestyler, still the Ultimate Styling Tool for Internet, Print and Video Graphics. Works great in Classic with a Native OS X Version on the way. Free Tryout: www.typestyler.com
Mac users can finally play Party Poker for Mac. Not only that, they can also learn how to play PokerStars for Mac.
Compare products like desktop computers, laptops, and LCD TVs side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for a new cell phone GPS products or MP3 players. The Ciao network makes searching products easy for you. - 2003.07.17 I read the announcements about the G5 with interest - not because I'm in the market for a new machine (I'm not), but because if the G5 hits 3 GHz in 2004, I'll be obligated to buy one. Either that, or I'll have to change the Factor of 3 rule I've followed for twenty years. It all started around 1984, the year the Macintosh debuted. The physics department at Berea College had a Fat Mac (I remember swapping those floppies, over and over and over, because it had no hard drive), and Professor Powell let me touch it every now and then to get a feel for how the mouse worked. A bit later he purchased an Atari 800 and set me to work writing simulation software and statistical analysis software for his classes. I spent a blissful summer holed up in a former storage closet with a stack of 5-1/4" floppies and an 8-position joystick. The Atari 800 used a 1 MHz 6502 processor. I gave this one to my sister, who gave it to my nephew. Anyway, ancient history aside, I decided I had to have one of these machines for myself. Eventually, being poor, married, unemployed, and so on, I convinced my wife I just absolutely had to have a Timex-Sinclair 1000. For $100, I had my first 2.5 MHz Z-80 based computer, and for $50 more I got a whopping 16 K RAM expansion module (expanded from 1 K). I wore that one out, as well as another one I bought used. Eventually they just wore out; those membrane keyboards don't last forever. The next computer I invested in was an Atari 520 ST, soon supplanted with a 1040 STe, one of which stayed home, the other at school in my new teaching job. I wore out those machines, several printers, and a hard drive setting up handouts for students. I still have some of those documents floating around after having been translated several times from 1st Word to Microsoft Word to AppleWorks. The ST series used an 8 MHz Motorola 68000 processor (the same as in the earliest Macs) and had enough horsepower to drive a pretty decent GUI which was sort of a hybrid of a Mac and a PC. For several years, the ST was a serious competitor for Apple and the Commodore Amiga. There were few things I couldn't do with it, up to and including signing on to the various independent BBS's you could join at the time, a precursor to the Internet. My sister has the 520 ST, and the 1040 is sitting on a shelf at school for when I get around to building my computer museum. I see this story could get very long indeed, so I'll stop reminiscing and get to the point.
Can you see the pattern? Every computer switch is accompanied by a MHz increase by a factor of approximately 3. Several of these computers, including the TiBook, were purchased by companies or schools for my exclusive use, so expense is not the driving force I thought it would be 20 years ago. RAM is so flexible, it isn't the issue either; same for hard drive space, although that has increased at an even greater rate than the processor speed. I think that the speed increase needs to be sufficiently great that there are real things I cannot do with the slower machine. The G3 sitting idle upstairs can run Jaguar, but apparently not Panther. I think it's destined to become a server for my house. What distinct advantages will a 3 GHz machine have over the 1 GHz machine I use now? The TiBook is plenty peppy for me, although some applications such as Macromedia Dreamweaver take a while to open. Most times I don't notice big problems. Jaguar is certainly much more stable than OS 9 ever was. I don't do a lot of video, but I do some. Will this factor of 3 be sufficient for me to seek funds or pay from my own pocket for the next generation machine? I don't know. I think the only thing that will drive me to such a point will be that some of the applications I want will require the speed or I start doing a lot more video. If not 3 GHz, then what speed will tempt me? I think I'll start mumbling about upgrades around 5 GHz, and by 10 GHz I will be unable to resist. Maybe my "Rule of 3" needs to become a "Rule of 10." Somehow, I think I'll find an excuse sooner than that, if history is any indication. Jeff Adkins is a science teacher who isn't afraid to state his preferences in computing platforms. In his classroom he has everything from a beige All-in-One to a a G4 XServe, and they all work together nicely. He calls himself the "poster child for technology integration" in the classroom. He was the 2006 Outstanding Educator of the Year for the California Computer Using Educators (CUE) organization. He also maintains a site for astronomy teachers at www.AstronomyTeacher.com. Recent Mac Lab Reports
Links for the Day
Recent Content on Low End Mac
Recent Deals
|
Power Macs iMac Channel iBook/PowerBook MacInSchool Computer Profiles iMac Power Mac PowerBook/iBook Performas Mac Clones Older Macs Lisa • NeXT Editorial Archive Mac Daniel's Advice Email Lists LEMchat (uses AIM) Online Tech Journal Consumer advice, reviews guides, deals Software Apple History Best of the Web Best of the Mac Web surveys Miscellaneous Links Best Used Mac Buys Used Mac Dealers Video Cards Mac OS X Mac Linux Macspeak RAM Upgrades About Low End Mac Site Contacts
Support LEMAffiliates
|
