Well, let's get this part out of the way first. The folks over at
the Cube-Zone will tell you
the Cube didn't fail, still
has life in it, won x-many awards, and so on and so forth.
Nevertheless, we can all agree that the Cube's sales have been, shall
we say, less than phenomenal.
Much has been written on this topic, mostly about the price point
of the Cube (a view I agree with) but the true answer, I think, is
more complex than simply price.
It has to do with perception.
When you purchase an iMac, the first thing the novice computer
user asks (believe me, with several Demo Days under my belt I know)
is, "Where's the computer?"
"It's inside the monitor," I say. "It's all right in there," I
would reassure them as they looked at me in wonderment. Pointing at
the CD-ROM, I'd show the translucent cover and how there was
circuitry visible inside.
"Oh, how clever," they'd say, and then I could proceed to show
them all the features of the computer.
Now consider the novice user - or even a non-power user in an
office setting, someone not interested in accelerated graphics cards
and PCI slots - encountering a Cube.
"Is the monitor included?"
"Uh, no," you'd have to reply. "That's extra. But what a great LCD
display this is! Look how bright! Look how high the resolution is!
And the wide viewing angle! And the
active-matrix-that-doesn't-let-your-cursor-disappear!"
As you pause for breath, the customer fires off a question: "Is
the LCD monitor included?"
"Uhmm, no," you say, following up with, "No fan! Slot loading!
Touch-sensitive on-switch! Gigabit ethernet available!" And even
though the ethernet card is as expensive as many PCs and makes the
Cube a real steal, the next question is inevitable.
"So - there's no monitor?"
"Uh, no."
"And without a monitor, it costs more than an iMac?"
"Uh, well, yes, more than the low-end version at least. But not
more than...."
"So why am I paying more and getting less?"
And there you have it. Gigabit ethernet, G4 processor, and
crack-free external clear case notwithstanding, the casual user sees
the Cube as a purchase which requires additional expenses not
necessary with any other computer. You see, almost no one sells CPUs
in a retail setting without the monitor. Not to novice users
anyway.
Which brings us back to the price point. Apple is sure to
discourage folks from noticing that VGA port under the Cube. They
want you to buy one of those new ADC (Apple Display Connector) LCD
panels, but that makes the Cube seem much more a premium item than it
is. The audience for the Cube is apparently the same audience as for
the
20th Anniversary Mac: people
interested in making an aesthetic statement at the expense of
expandability and versatility. And the 20th Anniversary Mac was not a
huge seller; no one expected it to be because of its enormous
price.
To a novice user, a $1,200 Cube without monitor can seem more
expensive than an $1,600 computer which includes a monitor because
deciding on a monitor and listening to salesmen make their pitches is
a hassle and a pain. Now any experienced user (and all of our readers
at LEM) would sneer at such a thing, but remember we're talking about
the novice users Apple must lure in to make sales. Even an
experienced Windows user is a novice Mac user and will have many of
the same perceptions about value, and hassles, and features.
Sans monitor, the Cube should have been (should be) priced
less than an iMac, because to a novice, a monitor is more important
(hence more valuable) than all the internal hardware that brings such
value to the Cube as it currently exists - for those of us in the
know.
There you have it: my theory regarding the Cube. The Cube wasn't
so much too expensive but under-featured, the primary feature missing
at the advertised price being an included monitor.
Is the Cube's dilemma about price, or is it about features? The
market will eventually decide.
Jeff Adkins is a science teacher who isn't afraid to state his preferences in computing platforms. In his classroom he has everything from a beige All-in-One to a a G4 XServe, and they all work together nicely. He calls himself the "poster child for technology integration" in the classroom. He was the 2006 Outstanding Educator of the Year for the California Computer Using Educators (CUE) organization. He also maintains a site for astronomy teachers at www.AstronomyTeacher.com.
Mac of the Day: 17" iMac G4/800 MHz, July 2002 - The iMac 'grows up' with a 17" 1440 x 900 display.
Group of the Day: MichiMac is our list for Mac users in Michigan.
December 3 in LEM history: 01: The future of low-end Macs - Internet charges and Low End Mac - 02: A smooth switch with Move2Mac - 04: Upgrading from Mac OS 9 to 10.3 - PC malware: The best reasons to use a Mac - No sympathy for bashing Macs in schools - 'Book fragility - 07: Switching to Mac tripled my productivity - Leopard on a G3 iMac (with a G4 upgrade)
Recent Content on Low End Mac
OS X More Efficient than Linux, Snow Leopard and PowerPC Macs, and Eudora Woes, Charles W. Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 12.03.
A user reports both Panther and Leopard run more smoothly and use memory more efficiently than Linux. Also thoughts on PowerPC abandonment in Snow Leopard and replacing Eudora in Leopard.
The Leopard Experience at 867 MHz, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 12.02.
Mac OS X 10.5 requires an 867 MHz G4 with 512 MB of memory, but is performance really acceptable on a minimum spec system?
A Used 17" PowerBook as a Budget Notebook Alternative, Charles W. Moore, 'Book Value, 12.02.
Sure, you can buy a refurbished 13.3" MacBook for under $900, but you could also have an expansive, feature laden 17" PowerBook in the same price range.
The Very Best Macs: Sometimes Apple Just Nails It, Andrew J Fishkin, Best Tools for the Job, 12.01.
Apple has produced lots of good Macs, a few dogs, and some 'best of breed' models that stand apart from the pack.
Apple Could Buy Dell, and Linux Is No Threat to Mac OS X, Charles W. Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 12.01.
Apple has the cash to buy Dell outright, and the idea has some merit. Also, why Linux still isn't ready to displace the Mac OS.
Best Intel iMac Deals, 12.03.
Used 17" 1.83 GHz, $550; 20" 2.0, $650; refurb 20" 2.4, $999; 2.66, $1,299; 24" 2.8, $1,549; 3.06, $1,899; rebates and free shipping on new.
Best Mac OS X 10.4 'Tiger' Deals, 12.02.
DVD upgrade from 10.3, $75; full version, $129; family pack, $200; 10-user Server, $350; unlimited users, $400.
Best Mac Pro Deals, 12.01.
Used 3.0 GHz 4-core, $2,102; new 2.66 GHz 4-core, $1,949 after rebate; 2.8 4-core, $2,099 a/r; 8-core, $2,515 a/r; 3.0 $3,320 a/r; 3.2, $4,099 a/r.
Our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For detailed
price quotes and advertising information, please
contactat BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number
is for advertising only.