Windows Can't Compete

Steve Wozniak says that Apple won because all today's computers look like Macs. Bill Gates thinks Microsoft Windows won because he borrowed all of Apple's good ideas.

Sorry, but it just isn't so.

I recently had my first Nightmare with Windows. We honestly figured it made more sense to buy a Windows computer than upgrade a Mac to the point where it could handle Virtual PC. It was probably a mistake.

Sure, there's a strong visual resemblance between the Mac OS and Windows. There's also a visual resemblance between some of those VW body kits and certain classic cars.

That doesn't mean they're the same thing.

Removable media drives

For instance, on every Mac with a floppy drive, every Mac with a CD-ROM, and every Mac with a removable media drive (Zip, Jaz, SyQuest, whatever), the computer knows when there's a disk present. Pop it in, watch the Finder mount it on your desktop.

That's because Apple designed both the hardware and the software. In the DOS world, a computer doesn't know if you've stuck in a floppy disk. It may not recognize a Zip or CD, either, until you tell Windows to look for it.

The mouse

Every Mac knows what to do whey you move the mouse or click the button. But in the Windows world, you need a software driver. Nice thing is, it does come with Windows and it does work with most mice.

Your monitor

We in the Mac world have been spoiled. Since 1987 we've been able to change bit-depth on the fly. And not long after that, the first video cards to support on-the-fly resolution switching came along.

Windows 95 never supported that. Windows 98 tries, but really wants you to restart the computer when you make changes like that.

Can you hear me?

I'm incredulous. The Compaq Presario can't even beep unless you hook up speakers or have an AV monitor.

Every Mac ever made has a speaker built in. And we never have to worry about sound cards.

That's integration.

Hard drives

Ever since 1986, we've been able to attach SCSI drives to our Macs. Just chain them together. Give each one a unique ID, but don't worry about things like the number of platters, heads, sectors, and tracks. SCSI did all that for us.

They're getting there in the Windows world, but it'll probably take USB and FireWire to make it as easy as it's always been on the Mac.

Networking

Windows people still think networking is a cutting edge option. Every Mac since the Plus has built-in networking, either LocalTalk, ethernet, or both. And the iMac bumps it to the next level with 100Mbps ethernet.

Two Macs makes a network. Two PCs makes . . . a pair of computers.

iMac competition?

Sure, the Wintel world wants to steal Apple's thunder. They'll design new computers that copy the iMac design. We'll probably start seeing them after Christmas.

Of course, next January the Mac turns 15, so we can expect Apple to come out with new Macs that go a step beyond the iMac. Maybe a bigger iMac, a faster iMac, a headless iMac. Definitely a Power Mac G4 prototype.

But Apple won't be copying anyone's design. Maybe they'll show a PowerBook where the screen can be removed or reversed, one with built-in handwriting recognition like the Newton had. And one with Apple features that will set it apart from any Windows computer.

Or how about a desktop computer with a 15" 1024 x 768 LCD that pivots. The computer itself would be about 4" thick and hide behind the screen. You would insert CD-ROM and DVD disks through a narrow slot instead of using a clunky tray. It would use convection for cooling as much as possible, minimizing the need for a fan.

After almost 15 years of trying to compete with Apple and the Macintosh operating system, the Wintel world still doesn't understand the incredible integration of software and hardware that sets the Macintosh apart from all contenders.

I sometimes wonder if Apple does.

It's a benefit worth promoting while the Wintel consortium continues to push their "as good as a Mac" computer based on looks, not reality.

Besides, thanks to the iMac, ours look better than theirs.

Recent Content on Low End Mac

• OS X More Efficient than Linux, Snow Leopard and PowerPC Macs, and Eudora Woes, Charles W. Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 12.03. A user reports both Panther and Leopard run more smoothly and use memory more efficiently than Linux. Also thoughts on PowerPC abandonment in Snow Leopard and replacing Eudora in Leopard.
• The Leopard Experience at 867 MHz, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 12.02. Mac OS X 10.5 requires an 867 MHz G4 with 512 MB of memory, but is performance really acceptable on a minimum spec system?
• A Used 17" PowerBook as a Budget Notebook Alternative, Charles W. Moore, 'Book Value, 12.02. Sure, you can buy a refurbished 13.3" MacBook for under $900, but you could also have an expansive, feature laden 17" PowerBook in the same price range.

Latest Deals on Low End Mac

• More links in our archive.

Go to the iMac channel home page.

Low End Mac was started on 1997.04.07. The iMac Channel est'd 1998.06.06. This page and the entire Low End Mac site copyright ©1997-2004 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. Copyright for individual articles resides with the author. All rights reserved.

Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Computers are like that. Please report errors to Dan Knight .

Letters sent to Low End Mac may or may not be published at the editor's discretion. Email addresses will not be published unless the sender specifically requests it. If you prefer that your message not be published on Low End Mac, clearly mark your message "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.

LINK POLICY: This site allows and encourages links to any public page, so long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking the linked page.

PRIVACY POLICY: In brief, we don't collect any personal information unless you subscribe to one of our email lists, in which case you have to give us your email address.

Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Computer, Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iMac, and iBook are registered trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks of the individual companies and are hereby acknowledged.