The Efficient Mac User

How Consumer Reports Could Compare Macs Fairly

- 2005.11.23 - Tip Jar

Many Low End Mac readers have responded to last week's article on how badly Consumer Reports (CR) handles Macintosh computers in their holiday gift buying guide. There has been a lot of agreement and affirmation, and it's great to see that the word is getting out about the shortcomings of CR's ratings.

A few readers mentioned that they hoped for CR-style ratings charts in my article, but they were disappointed not to find them. I considered including charts with the original article, but I decided not to because I didn't have access to the data for all of the machines I wanted to include.

On further consideration (and after discussion with the editors at Low End Mac), I decided to follow-up with some Consumer Reports-style ratings charts that compare Apple's machines appropriately and fairly.

These charts show how CR could have compared Apple's computers with Windows PCs. They were created by the author, adpted from CR's data, and are provided as an example only and are not intended to replace CR's copyrighted material.

Disclaimer: The original CR data used to generate the charts below (on pages 36 & 37 of the December 2005 issue, Vol. 70 No. 12) only included a total of three Macintosh desktop computers and two Macintosh laptops. Thus, the four additional Macintosh machines shown below include ratings data that is approximated and not a product of CR's testing (or any other formal testing).

If you read the first article, you'll know that I had two primary complaints about the CR ratings charts. First, they segregated the Macs into a Macintosh "ghetto" so that point-by-point comparison was difficult or impossible. Second, they included a minimal number of Macintosh systems, in the process suggesting that the Apple line either didn't have machines that would fit into their categories or inferring that one system or another was worse than it purports to be.

Here, then, is my version of a good Desktop System ratings chart. Notice that I have added one of the Power Mac G5 systems to the "workhorse" category. (Click on the these charts to see the full-sized originals.)

Ranking Key:

EX = excellent

VG = very good

GD = good

FR = fair

PR = poor

Notes in the ratings:

Systems are ranked by their overall scores. The best that I can tell is that these are determined by the test results; therefore, the score and test results for the Power Mac G5 system (line 10) are approximated using the system specs and a comparison to the non-Macintosh machines on the chart.

USB ports listed do not include the two USB 1.1 ports available on Apple keyboards, which are supplied with all Macintosh systems listed except the Mac mini.

Warranty presents an interesting rating when it comes to the Apple machines, since CR ranks the Apple warranty as "Good" while they consistently give Apple very high marks for customer service and support.

Price is approximated for the system only, with the exception of the iMac and eMac, which both include built-in displays. Please note that the price for the Mac mini has been adjusted from CR's approximation, since they added in $78 for mouse and keyboard, which are not a part of the "system only" described.

Likewise, here is an adjusted version of the Laptop Computers ratings chart. This time you'll notice that I've added three additional Macintosh 'Books into the mix.

Ranking key is the same for both charts.

Notes on the ratings:

Again, systems are ranked by their overall scores. As with the desktops, I approximated results for the additional included machines: the 12" iBook (line 2), the 17" PowerBook (line 9), and the 12" PowerBook (line 13). This time, however, my approximations were based on comparisons to other non-Macintosh machines and to the Macs that were ranked.

Note also that the listings (taken from CR) show an older model for the 15" PowerBook, which now has a better screen resolution for the same price. (I'll grant that this is likely the case for many of the systems listed because of CR's lead time.)

As you can see, when placed side-by-side, the Macintosh systems hold their own and, in many cases, rise to the top for performance, features, and overall ranking. Consumer Reports truly ought to develop a more comprehensive and fair cross-platform rating system, especially given the rising popularity of the Macintosh platform.

If all other considerations are truly equal, CR should give consumers a clear picture of how Macs compare to their Windows PC counterparts.

One more conclusion that I arrived at through this exercise: CPU speed is fairly useless for determining the functionality of a machine. I know that Apple proponents (and Apple spokespeople) have been claiming this for years, but a close look at these charts shows it demonstrably. Anytime you can have 3 GHz, 1.8 GHz, and 1.67 GHz machines all performing equally with something as taxing as multimedia (see "Multimedia Laptops"), you know there is a disparity. This is not just a difference from one chip maker to another, either - notice the number of variations made by Intel but ranked approximately the same for speed and performance. Chip speed is truly no longer a predictor of performance.

Once again, I hope this is helpful in guiding your holiday shopping. Shop smart!

If you find Ed's articles helpful, please consider making a donation to his tip jar.

Recent Efficient Mac User articles

• Think bull: Why the shuttering of Think Secret is no big deal, 01.04. Apple and Ciarelli have reached a mutually satisfactory agreement, and journalism is not at stake here.
• Wishes for 2008: Apple TV content, task management for the iPhone, and the MacBook mini, 12.13. Apple TV is being held back due to limited content, the iPhone needs solid task management, and it's time for Apple to redefine the ultra-portable notebook market.
• Why I won't be getting an iPhone this year, 05.21. The iPhone is likely to have early problems, prices are bound to come down, and the current service contract won't allow the switch until January 2008.
• 11 ways to optimize your Mac's performance, 03.12. If your Mac is getting sluggish, here are 11 tips that can help restore its original performance.
• More in the Efficient Mac User index.

Links for the Day

• Mac of the Day: eMac, Apr. 2002 - 50 lb. 17" white G4 eMac replaced the iMac for the education market.
• Group of the Day: MacCube is the email list for Cube users.
  
• December 3 in LEM history: 01: The future of low-end Macs - Internet charges and Low End Mac - 02: A smooth switch with Move2Mac - 04: Upgrading from Mac OS 9 to 10.3 - PC malware: The best reasons to use a Mac - No sympathy for bashing Macs in schools - 'Book fragility - 07: Switching to Mac tripled my productivity - Leopard on a G3 iMac (with a G4 upgrade)

Recent Content on Low End Mac

• OS X More Efficient than Linux, Snow Leopard and PowerPC Macs, and Eudora Woes, Charles W. Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 12.03. A user reports both Panther and Leopard run more smoothly and use memory more efficiently than Linux. Also thoughts on PowerPC abandonment in Snow Leopard and replacing Eudora in Leopard.
• The Leopard Experience at 867 MHz, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 12.02. Mac OS X 10.5 requires an 867 MHz G4 with 512 MB of memory, but is performance really acceptable on a minimum spec system?
• A Used 17" PowerBook as a Budget Notebook Alternative, Charles W. Moore, 'Book Value, 12.02. Sure, you can buy a refurbished 13.3" MacBook for under $900, but you could also have an expansive, feature laden 17" PowerBook in the same price range.
• The Very Best Macs: Sometimes Apple Just Nails It, Andrew J Fishkin, Best Tools for the Job, 12.01. Apple has produced lots of good Macs, a few dogs, and some 'best of breed' models that stand apart from the pack.
• Apple Could Buy Dell, and Linux Is No Threat to Mac OS X, Charles W. Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 12.01. Apple has the cash to buy Dell outright, and the idea has some merit. Also, why Linux still isn't ready to displace the Mac OS.
• More links in our archive.

Recent Deals

• Best PowerBook G3 Deals, 12.03. Used 14" WallStreet G3/266 MHz, $90; Lombard G3/400 MHz, $150; Pismo G3/400 MHz, $300; 500 MHz, $350.
• Best 17" PowerBook G4 Deals, 12.03. Used 1.5 GHz, $685; 1.67 GHz, $699.
• Best Intel iMac Deals, 12.03. Used 17" 1.83 GHz, $550; 20" 2.0, $650; refurb 20" 2.4, $999; 2.66, $1,299; 24" 2.8, $1,549; 3.06, $1,899; rebates and free shipping on new.
• Best Mac OS X 10.4 'Tiger' Deals, 12.02. DVD upgrade from 10.3, $75; full version, $129; family pack, $200; 10-user Server, $350; unlimited users, $400.
• Best iMac G5 Deals, 12.02. Used 17" 1.6 GHz Combo, $400; 1.8 SuperDrive, $450; 1.9 iSight, $599; 20" 1.8 GHz, $500; 2.0, $600; 2.1 iSight, $700. Shipping additional.
• Best 17" MacBook Pro Deals, 12.02. Used 2.16 GHz Core Duo, $1,330; 2.33 Core 2, $1,499; close-out, 2.4, $1,800 after rebate; new 2.5, $2,000 a/r; new hi-res, $2,499 a/r; refurb 2.6, $2,399.
• Best iPod nano Deals, 12.01. Refurb 3G/4 GB, $79; new, $105; refurb 8 GB, $99; new, $115; 3G/8 GB, $134; 16 GB, $174. Prices include ground shipping.
• Best 12" PowerBook G4 Deals, 12.01. Used 1.5 GHz SuperDrive, $481/C$599 plus shipping.
• Best Mac Pro Deals, 12.01. Used 3.0 GHz 4-core, $2,102; new 2.66 GHz 4-core, $1,949 after rebate; 2.8 4-core, $2,099 a/r; 8-core, $2,515 a/r; 3.0 $3,320 a/r; 3.2, $4,099 a/r.
• More deals in our archive.

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

The Efficient Mac User articles copyright ©2005-08 by Ed Eubanks. Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2008 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
  LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
  Access our RSS news feed at http://lowendmac.com/feed.xml.
  Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
  PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.
  Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iBook, iMac, eMac, iPod, iPhone, PowerBook, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.

Have a question?
Ask an expert!

Navigation

Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Best Used Macs
Video Cards
Email Lists
InfoMac's Low
End Mac Forum

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
   Museum
DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
   Mac FAQ
Abandonware
   Petition
Mac vs. PC Info

Affiliates

The Apple Store
Mac Connection
MacMall
TechRestore
MacResQ
ExperCom
Crucial Memory
batteries.com

Advertise

All of our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For price quotes and advertising information, please contact at BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number is for advertising only.

Problems viewing this page with Internet Explorer 5.5 or 6? It works fine in other browsers, including IE 7. We recommend Firefox for those using Windows, as it is standards based and more secure than IE 6 (and earlier). More LEM visitors use Firefox than any other browser.