Mac Spectrum
Is Leopard Slower than Tiger on G4 Macs?
- 2009.04.17 - Tip Jar
Popularity: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I have had so many arguments with people stating that Apple deliberately geared Mac OS X 10.5 'Leopard' to perform much better on Intel machines so as to pull people away from the PowerPC platform, that I thought it was about time this myth was laid to rest. I wrote an article a few months ago (Leopard Runs Very Nicely on PowerPC Macs) and thought I would follow it up with some benchmarks and facts.
You might think it is a bit late now that we are about to enter the Snow Leopard era, but there are still so many machines out there capable of running Leopard yet are stuck with Mac OS X 10.4 'Tiger' because people are scared of slower performance.
I am writing this on an 867 MHz 15" PowerBook G4. I have been running Leopard on it for about six months with 768 MB of RAM, and it has been a pleasant experience. A few days ago I maxed it to 1 GB of RAM (the extra RAM really has made a lot of difference), and it is fitted with a 5400 RPM Fujitsu MHT2080AH 80 GB hard drive.
It is the lowest spec machine to officially support Leopard, so you would think that it would struggle to keep up, but it doesn't. So let's cut to the chase, let's look at the raw benchmark results.
I triple boot my PowerBook with Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.6), Mac OS X Tiger (10.4.11), and Mac OS 9.2.2, so it is easier to get an accurate reading of which OS is faster, as they are all using exactly the same hardware. This was one of the last Macs to boot natively into OS 9, so while there is no Classic support in Leopard, I have the best of both the latest OS and am able to run older software.
OS 9 absolutely screams along on this hardware.
- Mac OS X 10.4: Xbench is 27.58, and Geekbench is 542.
- Mac OS X 10.5: Xbench is 26.43, and Geekbench is 519.
Yes, there is a little performance drop (about 4%), but then Leopard is a difference kettle of fish. Tiger was designed to run on 300 MHz G3 machines and is far less dependent on your graphics card. I still hold my stance, that the main reason Apple raised the bar so high with the minimum specs of Leopard was to ensure maximum graphics capabilities.
I have run Leopard on a 400 MHz Power Mac and PowerBook, and it is definitely the graphics that pull the machine down. If you were to put a Leopard-compatible graphics card in a 400 MHz 'Sawtooth' Power Mac G4, I don't think you would have too much problem using it as an everyday machine.
Leopard isn't much slower than Tiger, and I think you would see the gap narrow even more on a higher end G4. With a better equipped graphics card, you might even see Leopard perform better.
The 867 MHz 15" Titanium PowerBook came with 32 MB ATI Radeon 9000, and the 867 MHz 12" PowerBook came with 32 MB Nvidia GeForce 4 420 graphics. The 1 GHz 15" Titanium PowerBook came with a 64 MB ATI Radeon 9000. The 1 GHz 17" PowerBook came with an Nvidia GeForce 4 440, and the 1.33 GHz 12" PowerBook came with a GeForce FX Go5200. Some, like the 1.67 GHz 17" Aluminium PowerBook, came with 128 MB ATI Mobililty Radeon 9700.
These would cope much better with the high graphics demands of Leopard - they have more powerful graphics cards than some of early Intel Macs, such as the 1.5 GHz Core Solo Mac mini, 1.67 GHz Core Duo Mac mini, 1.83 GHz Core Duo MacBook, and 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook, which was only equipped with a 64 MB shared Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950.
Leopard does run slightly slower on some PowerPC Macs, but then it is two years newer and has a lot of graphics intense features. Run it on a machine that has the minimum specs for Leopard, and you will see benchmark results drop slightly; run it on a higher spec'd G4, and you might even see them increase.
Leopard responds to as much as RAM as you can throw at it. I benchmarked my 867 MHz PowerBook G4 with both 768 MB of RAM and 1 GB of RAM, and adding extra RAM pushed both benchmark results and performance.
- With 768 MB RAM: Xbench 21.85 - Geekbench 424.
- With 1 GB RAM: Xbench 25.43 - Geekbench 519.
Got a Leopard capable G4 that is still running Tiger? Cram it with
RAM and install Leopard, you won't regret it.
Join us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.
Recent articles by Simon Royal
- Tiger or Leopard for PowerPC Macs? Does It Matter Anymore?, 2012.01.31. Does it really matter whether you run OS X 10.4 Tiger or 10.5 Leopard on your increasingly left-behind PowerPC Macs?
- No Old Apps for You: Apple's Message to Early iPhone Users, 2012.01.23. iOS 3 users can no longer download compatible apps if newer versions are not iOS 3 compatible.
- Is There Room for the Original iPhone in 2012?, 2012.01.11. The original iPhone was no speed demon in 2007, but it can still be a useful smartphone today.
- More in the Mac Spectrum index.
Links for the Day
- Mac of the Day: Mac IIci, introduced 1989.09.20. The fastest Mac to date, the 25 MHz IIci was a real workhorse and a big hit.
- February 11 in LEM history: 98: Disposable modems - 00: Setting up a Mac web server - Small network backup solutions - 02: Flea market Mac Plus - I love this Quadra! - 03: Jaguar revisited - Beige G3 upgrades - 05: The key to Apple's success - Which iPod is best for you? - 08: Could a wireless dock be in the MacBook Air's future? - 2 of Apple's best notebooks ever
- Support Low End Mac
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- Fix Home Button Delay, Tablet the Ultimate Mobile PC, iPad Notebook a Possibility, and More, iOS News Review, 2012.02.10. Also using your iPad at work, two photo editors, a new iPad text editor, Macally's magnetic iPad 2 stand, and more.
- White MacBook Goes End-of-Life, Logitech Touch Mouse Supports Gestures, Firmware Updates, and More, The 'Book Review, 2012.02.10. Also MacBook Air better than any Ultrabook, docks for MacBook Pro models, Intel offers improved SSDs, and more.
- Mac and iOS Browsers: Options Galore, Freeware Forum, 2012.02.10. Safari is adequate on Mac and great on iOS, but the range of good alternatives is stunning. LEM writers share their favorites.
- Apple's Support Lead Shipping, Smartphones Outsell PCs, OS X Ported to ARM by Intern, and More, Mac News Review, 2012.02.10. Also the power of Tex-Edit Plus, Google and Twitter are already censoring the Web, Snow Leopard Security Update, and more.
- LogMeIn: Remote Screen Sharing for the Rest of Us, Alan Zisman, Zis Mac, 2012.02.09. Configuring the Mac's built-in screen sharing to work over the Internet can be difficult or impossible. LogMeIn makes it easy.
- 15 Years Ago Motorola Unveiled the PowerPC G3, Low End Mac Round Table, 2012.02.06. The G3 processor was optimized for real world Mac software and made a big leap forward in efficiency.
- Don't Kill Caps Lock, Learning to Love the iOS Keyboard, and an Adaptive iPad Keyboard, Charles W. Moore, Miscellaneous Ramblings, 2012.02.06. The Caps Lock key has a useful function, the iPad's keyboard really is useful, and checking out an adaptive keyboard for the iPad.
- More links in our archive.
Recent Deals
- Best MacBook Air Deals
- Best iBook G4 Deals
- Best iPad Deals
- Best Classic Mac OS Deals
- Best Apple TV Deals
- Best 15" MacBook Pro Deals
- Best Power Mac G4 Deals
- Best Mac OS X 10.6 Deals
- More deals in our archive.
About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact
Follow
Low End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Mac
on Facebook
Low End Mac Reader Specials
TypeStyler 11 is now in the Mac App Store!! -- Special Introductory Price of $59.95!! -- To Buy From The Mac App Store Click Here Now!! Or buy direct
from Strider Software.
Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker and Mac Casino applications in minutes.
Favorite Sites
MacSurfer
Cult of Mac
Shrine of Apple
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac Museum
DealMac
Deal Brothers
Mac2Sell
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End Mac FAQ
Affiliates
Amazon.com
The Apple Store
The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
GainSaver
Parallels Desktop for Mac
eBay

