Low End Mac Reader Specials

TypeStyler For Mac OS X is Now Shipping! Download The Free Fully Functional 60 Day Tryout at www.typestyler.com

OWC: Mercury On-The-Go FW800+USB2 up to 1.0TB. Bus Powered, no external power supply needed. Macworld ‘Editor’s Choice’, CNET ‘Very Good’ Starting from $99.97, 500GB $159.99. Click here

Poker Mac Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker application such as Full Tilt Poker Mac.

Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.

Compare products like desktop computers, apple laptops, apple macs, and LCD Monitors side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for new mobile phones, sat nav systems, or MP3 players. The Ciao online shopping community makes searching products easy for you.

Mac Spectrum

Are G3 Macs Still Viable Work Machines?

- 2008.09.08 - Tip Jar

Popularity: LEMLEMLEMLEMLEM

del.icio.us Bookmark in del.icio.us

I am a firm believer in getting the very most out of older hardware - part of the reason I like and write for Low End Mac. With the move to Leopard (Mac OS X 10.5), Apple cut out a lot of older computer users and began a slow death for the G3.

But do we need the latest OS to get on with our computing lives?

Quite frankly no.

Developers have only recently stepped the minimum requirements for software to Mac OS X 10.4 (and some still develop latest versions of their software for Mac OS X 10.3), so there is still life in older operating systems. I know people 8 years on who haven't made the move to OS X and still praise the fantastic OS 9.

But what about hardware?

12 inch iBook G3High-end G3s topped at 900 MHz. My wife had an iBook G3/800 MHz maxed with 640 MB of RAM until a few months ago, and this screamed along. For video editing or heavy picture editing it would struggle, but for basic word processing, listening to music, surfing the Web, and emailing, it was lightning fast. She was running Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger" on it, and it was not sluggish at all.

indigo iMacMy son has an iMac G3/500 MHz, also with 640 MB of RAM, which I hadn't used for a while myself until the other day, and I was still surprised how responsive it was even under Tiger.

I had a Clamshell iBook G3 to repair recently and took the opportunity to test it out. It was a 366 MHz with 576 MB of RAM, a new 30 GB hard drive, and DVD-ROM fitted, so this was not a stock machine. It coped very well, although the 800 x 600 screen resolution was it's only let down.

I only recently laid to rest my Blue & White G3 tower with a 350 MHz processor and 640 MB of RAM, even this coped very well with Tiger. I had this kitted out with two large hard drives and a DVD burner and managed to burn data DVDs on it.

If you are still following this, you will have noticed that with each machine listed above they are getting further and further down the processor speed route, yet they are still going strong and are suitable for the user's needs with OS X 10.4.

Lombard PowerBook G3I am writing this article on a "Lombard" PowerBook G3. This is a 333 MHz model with 256 MB of RAM. It has Tiger installed (even though it is not supported officially by Apple). Now here comes the change: This machine struggles with everyday tasks. This has nothing to do with Tiger being installed, as it actually runs better with on this computer than Panther did.

The Key to Good Performance

Even at this level, the processor is not the main contributing factor to it's speed. The main factor in all of these machines is RAM. Tiger requires 256 MB of RAM as a minimum, and as we know, minimum means not snails pace. For any machine, be it a G3 or G4, that is going to be running Tiger, I recommend 512 MB as a bare minimum, and more if you can get it. It takes a lot of pressure off of the processor and hard drive, it gives the whole system breathing room and dramatically increases the speed of the machine.

A friend of mine has a Lombard PowerBook G3 (a 400 MHz model), but is fitted with 512 MB of RAM and a 20 GB hard drive. The speed difference between hers and mine is amazing. Her machine really is useable; RAM is the key.

To answer my original question, the answer is yes. It obviously depending on the tasks you are looking to perform. As a machine for writing on the move or surfing away from home, these are superb. As a writer, I spend most of my time in a word processor or using a web-based writing program, which doesn't require much processing power once the machine is running, so an older G3 is superb. I even edit images for the Web on it without too much trouble.

Looking Ahead

However, with Leopard requiring a midrange G4 (867 MHz) as bare minimum and the forthcoming "Snow Leopard" Mac OS X 10.6 looking to cut out the entire range of PowerPC Macs, how much longer can we hold on to these aged machines and use them every day?

When developers start requiring Mac OS X 10.5 as a minimum spec for their software, then G3 and early G4 users will struggle. But for now I am not worried.

To prove my loyalty to older Macs, I have just ordered a "Pismo" PowerBook G3 to replace my Lombard. My Lombard is still working well, but the cost to max out the RAM to 512 MB is expensive. and I got a good deal on a Pismo. Plus my Lombard is rather battered.

Long live the G3. LEM

Recent Columns by Simon Royal

Royal also has his own Mac specific website.

Links for the Day

Recent Content on Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2009 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
  LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
  Access our RSS news feed at http://lowendmac.com/feed.xml.
  Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
  PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.
  Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iBook, iMac, eMac, iPod, iPhone, PowerBook, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.

Custom Search

Amazon.com

Navigation

Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Video Cards
Email Lists

Favorite Sites

MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
   Museum
DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System 6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
   Mac FAQ
Abandonware
   Petition
Mac vs. PC Info

Affiliates

The Apple Store
Mac Connection
B&H
MacMall
TechRestore
ExperCom
Crucial Memory
batteries.com

Advertise

All of our advertising is handled by BackBeat Media. For price quotes and advertising information, please contact at BackBeat Media (646-546-5194). This number is for advertising only.

Open Link

Problems viewing this page with Internet Explorer 5.5 or 6? It works fine in other browsers, including IE 7. We recommend Firefox for those using Windows, as it is standards based and more secure than IE 6 (and earlier). More LEM visitors use Firefox than any other browser.