Stop the Noiz

Multicore Strategy: Microsoft vs. Apple

Frank Fox - 2009.06.18 - Tip Jar

Popularity:

Short link: http://bit.ly/4n1jP

I thought the headline Apple Steals Microsoft's Multicore Thunder with Grand Central (by Randall C. Kennedy) sounded like an interesting read. Quite honestly, I didn't know that Microsoft had any thunder to steal.

I haven't seen many articles talking about how Windows 7 was going to be a multicore wonder OS. Last year, it didn't show up as a big highlight on Paul Thurrott's website or even in the list from Microsoft developer blog. I know, because I wrote about this last year.

So where is this thunder hiding that the headline is referring to?

After reading the article, all I can say is, "Randall, did you just wake up after being drunk for several years, because you aren't talking any sense." This has to be one of the most out-of-touch stories I've read lately.

"As it stands, you'll need to reach into the 20- to 30-core range before the multicore efficiencies of the Vista/Windows 7 kernel finally allow the OS to overtake Windows XP in terms of raw performance."
-Randall C. Kennedy, June 2009

I'm not of fan of Windows XP or Vista, but I can't believe that you would need a 20-30 core processor for Vista to equal XP. I've used both, and there just isn't that much difference. In fact, on a fast machine Vista is very usable. Maybe Randall hasn't tried running Vista on a quad-core Xeon computer with 6 GB of RAM (you could, if you had a Mac Pro, which also comes in 8-core versions), but it runs fine well before hitting the claimed 20 core beast Randall thinks it needs.

If I can't trust a Windows stooge to give me the straight scoop on Vista, I sure have a problem listening to him rant about how Apple does things. First off, the Mac OS and multiple processors go way back. The Mac clone builder DayStar was building dual- and quad-processor computers that ran the Mac OS way back in 1996. That predates even a dinosaur operating system like XP by five years.

I don't think Apple, which licensed the technology from DayStar, did much to fine tune the Mac OS to support multiple processors back in 1996, but they sure haven't been waiting until this year to catch up. The announcement from last year regarding Grand Central is just the progression of many years of working with multiple processor computers. (The modern era of multiprocessor Macs begins with the dual CPU "Mystic" Power Mac G4 in July 2000) Multiple processors have always given Mac OS X a boost in speed.

While Randall is right that Microsoft baked better multicore support into Vista three years ago, he is clueless on how long Apple has gradually and continually been adding multicore support to Mac OS X. Randall, instead of complaining about Apple's better skills at marketing, you should have done a better job comparing current multicore support between the two operating system families.

The issue for both Apple and Microsoft is how to deal with more than four cores. Code hasn't been optimized for that many, except for specialized hardware. Both Apple and Microsoft are in the same boat of getting developers to work with a growing number of processors crammed in to future computers.

"...these multicore-optimizing tweaks don't seem as extensive as Apple's parallel processing plans in Snow Leopard, headlined by what it calls Grand Central Dispatch.
"What's key about GCD is that if it works like Apple says, it'll make easy for app developers to use multiple cores by handling threading for the programmers.
-Matt Buchanan, Jan. 2009

There is no doubt that they are going to have similar sounding technologies. Are they going to "borrow" ideas from each other to further development? Probably, but common problems often lead to similar solutions.

Since I haven't heard much thunder from Microsoft about multicore support, all I can say is that Grand Central and OpenCL sound like incredible improvements. They should improve things not only for the next round of hardware, but also make major improvements for the Intel Macs I currently own. These technologies are not only about improving Apple software; Apple is giving these tools to developers to build better applications.

The bottom line is that no matter how good the headline reads, the next time a nutty yap tries telling you that Macs are only doing something to steal Microsoft's thunder, just smile and walk away as quickly as possible.

Join us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

Recent Stop the Noiz Columns

Dell XPS 13 Takes on the MacBook Air, 2012.01.20. Although Apple's MacBook Air wasn't the first ultrabook, it set the standard. How does Dell's new XPS 13 compare?
10 Reasons iPhone Users Should Like Android, 2012.01.12. Android is good for Apple, because good competition creates better products and more innovation.
Will Apple Introduce Its Own TV or Just Improve Apple TV?, 2012.01.11. Steve Jobs claimed to have "finally cracked" TV, but does that mean Apple will be introducing its own TV set?
More in the Stop the Noiz index.

Links for the Day

Mac of the Day: Mac IIfx, introduced 1990.03.19. This 'wicked fast' 40 MHz Mac trumped the 33 MHz DOS world.
February 14 in LEM history: 98: A perfect compact Mac - 00: Extended computer warranties worth the cost? - Making your PC work with your Mac - 01: Customize Microsoft Word - 02: Quadra revives a passion for computing - 03: Real world performance - DIY Pismo screen replacement - Best Mac for writing - 03: Fastest browser on the Mac - 06: 15" MacBook Pro - Impressions of a newly acquired Lisa - Finding and using free WiFi - Apple should liberate OS 9 - 07: New Mac mini cheaper than upgrading a Power Mac - 08: Falling in love with OS X
Support Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact

Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2012 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc. unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iPad iPhone, iMac, iPod, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.
Advice is presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Email may be published at our discretion unless marked "not for publication"; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.

Custom Search

Follow Low End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Mac on Facebook

Low End Mac Reader Specials

TypeStyler 11 is now in the Mac App Store!! -- Special Introductory Price of $59.95!! -- To Buy From The Mac App Store Click Here Now!! Or buy direct from Strider Software.

Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker and Mac Casino applications in minutes.

Affiliates

Amazon.com
The Apple Store
The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
GainSaver
Parallels Desktop for Mac
eBay