Stop the Noiz

SATA, SATA II, SATA 600, and Product Confusion Fatigue

Frank Fox - 2008.09.08 - Tip Jar

Popularity:

I 've been suffering from Product Confusion Fatigue (PCF).

It happens a lot in the world of computing. You want to upgrade something simple like a hard drive. Instead of just looking for the best price, you find a half-dozen different product descriptions - and now you don't know which one is compatible with your computer.

Probably the worst offender is RAM. It constantly changes name, number of pins, bus speed, etc. It's just a total mess.

The best thing to do is shop at a website that helps you find the RAM to match your computer model. Since I'm shopping for a Mac, it always feels like I could have saved a little more money if I could have picked a cheaper generic PC equivalent. But I always end up going the safe route, since I'd rather not have to send it back and try again.

SATA Confusion

This time I was looking for another SATA hard drive for my Mac Pro. The last time I bought, I just looked for SATA on the box and got the largest size I could afford. This time I went on eBay looking for a cheap spare drive. Suddenly I saw listings for Serial ATA, SATA, SATA-II, SATA 150, SATA 300, SATA-II/300, SATA with 3 Gb/s, etc.

When did buying a SATA drive get so complicated?

What do all these extension mean?

Most importantly, which ones are compatible with my computer?

Time to search the Web for answers.

First, what kind of SATA does my Mac have? I stop in at Apple for the answer, which is SATA 3 Gb/s.

Next it's time to find out the differences with SATA drives. I find some links that leads me to SATA-IO's website. This is the organization that controls the SATA specification and tests if products are compatible. These people should know what is going on with the SATA specification!

On this page they list some of the details about transfer speeds. The original SATA bus topped out at 150 MB/sec or 1.5 Gbit/s. Then they went up to 300 MB/sec (or 3 Gb/s). And soon they will be finalizing the specs for 600 MB/sec drives.

Great, there are now two - and soon to be three - possible speeds for SATA drives.

They're All Compatible

The good news is that the cable and connection is the same for any speed of SATA drive. What appears to be true is that any flavor of SATA is compatible with the other ones due to autonegotiation, although your computer's motherboard may not be able to communicate at the faster speed that SATA II drives support. Jumper pins may be needed to set the speed to match your computer.

My Mac Pro shouldn't need any jumpers set on the hard drive, but this may vary depending on brand.

Here's a summary of what the terms mean:

Serial ATA = SATA
SATA/150 = SATA 1.5Gb/s
SATA II = SATA 2 = SATA/300 = SATA II/300 = SATA 3Gb/s (usage of the first two names is contrary to the wishes of the Serial ATA International Organization)
SATA 600 = Serial ATA Revision 3.0 = SATA 6Gb/s (the Serial ATA International Organization hopes to avoid this being called SATA 3.0)

Any drive should work, but you may need to set jumper pins to match SATA/300 drives to SATA/150 computers.

This is great news, because despite the naming confusion, you can buy new drives without much worry about compatibility. This is much better than the ATA-33 and ATA-66 fiasco where drives above a certain size couldn't be used fully. This time the change in specification isn't about drive size so much as new controllers to allow for faster transfer speeds.

Now aren't you glad that someone else figured this all out so you don't have to?

Join us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, use our Google+ page, or read our RSS news feed

Recent Stop the Noiz Columns

The iPad mini Is Designed for Apple Users, Not Kindle or Nexus Switchers, 2012.11.02. The $329 iPad mini isn't designed to compete with Android tablets. It's meant for Mac, iPhone, iPod, and iTunes users - and new tablet buyers.
Apple's Real Problem with Samsung, 2012.10.31. It's hard for Apple to trust Samsung as a supplier when Samsung is competing in the smartphone and tablet space.
Which Is Apple's Biggest Threat, Microsoft or Google?, 2012.10.30. Most people think Apple and Microsoft compete against each other, but that's not exactly true.
More in the Stop the Noiz index.

Links for the Day

Mac of the Day: Quadra 950, introduced 1992.05.18. Apple's huge tower has 5 NuBus slots and runs a 33 MHz 68040 processor.
May 18 in LEM history: 92: Quadra 950 - 99: OS 8.6 more stable - 00: What can you squeeze into a compact Mac? - 01: Friendly LC 500s - Leaving Win2k behind - 05: OS X 10.4.1 update - A new PowerBook with Tiger - Tiger: Lots to like, but some annoyances - 06: 400K floppy click of death - I wish Apple were more like Microsoft - 07: 9.9% notebook market share
Support Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact

Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Opinions expressed are those of their authors and may not reflect the opinion of Cobweb Publishing. Advice is presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all.
Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2013 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc. unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Low End Mac, LowEndMac, and lowendmac.com are trademarks of Cobweb Publishing Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iPad, iPhone, iMac, iPod, MacBook, Mac Pro, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.
Please report errors to .
LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Email may be published at our discretion unless marked "not for publication"; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it, and we don't share the information we have with others. For more details, see our Terms of Use.