No More Ugly Dates (in Your Digital Photos)

Dan Knight - 2008.03.06

Bookmark in del.icio.us Suggest to Slashdot

Low End Mac Reader Specials

TypeStyler For Mac OS X is Now Shipping! Download The Free Fully Functional 60 Day Tryout at www.typestyler.com

OWC: Get the Right Memory for Your Mac Top Quality, Competitive Price, Lifetime Backed Free Expert Support + Installation Videos too! MacBook & mini 8GB, iMac 16GB, Mac Pro up to 32GB. Click here

Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker application such as Full Tilt Poker Mac.

Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.

Compare products like desktop computers, apple laptops, apple macs, and LCD Monitors side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for new mobile phones, sat nav systems, or MP3 players. The Ciao online shopping community makes searching products easy for you.

I've been into photography since the mid-1970s, and I've worked in camera store several times over the intervening years. For me, one of the banes of good enlargements is dates. I've seen more nice candids, animal shots, sunsets, etc. that would make excellent large prints - but they have a big, ugly date permanently etched into the negative.

You'd think we could have avoided that with digital photography, as each image records the date and time when it's taken, but camera makers just digitally duplicated the same kind of date imprinting they used with film cameras. The date is a permanent part of the photograph.

We have a couple digital cameras at home. The "good" is the Kodak EasyShare P880 that Waverly and I bought a few months before our honeymoon. (Tip: Never buy a camera just before leaving on a trip. Give yourself some time to get familiar with it.) It's got a great zoom range, the equivalent of 24-140mm on a 35mm SLR, and the wide-angle coverage is great for scenics.

The other is a Konica Minolta Dimage X50, which I bought a few years ago because I wanted something smaller than my Digital Rebel. It's got a 3x zoom and easily fits into a pocket. And until today, I'd never turned on the date features.

date in photo, Kodak EasyShare

Waverly and I have different philosophies of photography. I take pictures, store the photos in their envelopes or the digital files on my hard drive, share a few with others, and blow up some of the best to 8x10 for display. She takes pictures and scrapbooks them. For her, it's very important to have the date on every photo. That's great for snapshots, but I hate seeing big, blocky yellow digits on my enlargements, so I try to remember to turn dates off for scenics and then back on for Waverly.

That's what our Kodak EasyShare does. It takes great 8 MP photos, but those dates are butt-ugly. It got me to wondering - there has to be a better way.

date in photo, Dimage X50 The Dimage X50 does a much nicer job with dates. The numbers are white with black surrounding them, so the dates will show up on a yellow, white, or black background. This is a step in the right direction!

There's one other problem with dates in your photos: Verticals. Whether you rotate the camera 90° to the right or to the left, the date isn't going to be horizontal or at the bottom of your picture. It's sideways - and no different from what film cameras did.

vertical photo with date Why doesn't the camera sense that it's sideways? The date is applied to the image, so there's no reason it couldn't be written in the lower right-hand corner of verticals.

A Better Way

I've been thinking for a long time that there has to be a better way than just plopping the date in a fixed location using a fixed color. After all, the date and time are linked to the photo when it's taken. Why can't you decide after the fact whether you want the date in your picture, where you want it, and what color you want it to be?

In fact, why not save the photo without imposing the date on it? Why not allow the user to add the date and/or time any time in the future, since that data is already part of the photograph's digital file.

Here's my proposal: Set aside a fixed number of bytes to store the time and date that the photo was originally shot, along with time zone information. Maybe use the Unix time scheme for this. Next include a byte that tells whether the photo is horizontal, vertical (turned right or turned left), or upside-down. The next two bytes will determine where that date stamp appears in the printed photo.

digital photo with a good looking date stamp Then use three bytes to store 24-bit color data (the same color space used by digital cameras and computers). Another byte could tell whether the date should have a shadow or reverse shadow behind it to help it stand out from the background. Use one byte for the date format (YYYY-MM-DD, etc.). Create a list of standard fonts and use one byte to note the typeface. And finally, include one byte that tells the printer whether it should include the date or not.

Make this a free industry standard that can be used by camera makers, in photo kiosks, and in Photoshop and whatever program you might use to view and edit your photos.

Let's get rid of ugly dates on digital photos.

Recent Digigraphica Columns

Nikon D40 Provides Lots of Quality at a Nice Price, 10.28. For most photographers most of the time, Nikon's D40 DSLR has all the features and quality necessary and an affordable price.
Digital SLRs are affordable enough to replace 35mm SLRs, 03.11. Prices for DSLRs have dropped to record lows, and image quality generally matches or exceeds that of film.
High megapixel compact digicams may be worse than we thought, 02.21. In the rush to squeeze more megapixels into a tiny image sensor, manufacturers are sometimes making compromises that result in fuzzy, grainy, washed out images.
Busting the Megapixel Myth, 01.10. More megapixels can mean a better image, but in many cases it's more than you need and sometimes it can mean worse photos.
More in the Digigraphica index.

Links for the Day

Mac of the Day: 17" iMac G4/800 MHz, July 2002 - The iMac 'grows up' with a 17" 1440 x 900 display.
Group of the Day: LisaList supports Lisa users.
November 8 in LEM history: 99: OS 9: I think I like it - 01: The simplified Mac life - Soured on Windows - Flea market Mac - 02: Little room for improvement in new 'Books - Combo drive upgrade for iceBooks - 04: Re-Porter - 05: Fix the old iMac or buy a Mac mini? - Apple's Copland project - 06: MacBook Core 2 - MacBook value equation - Cheap is as cheap does - 07: Problems with Classic mode in Tiger - The G4 Power Mac that won't run Leopard
Support Low End Mac

Recent Deals

Best Mac Pro Deals, 11.03. Used 2.66 GHz 4-core, $1,300; 3.0 8-core. $2,299; refurb 2.66 4-core Nehalem, $2,149; 2.93, $2,549; 2.26 8-core, $2,799; 2.93, $4,999.
Best iPhone Deals, 11.03. New 8 GB iPhone 3G, $$99; refurb 16 GB 3GS, $149; new, $199; 32 GB, $299.
Best 12" PowerBook G4 Deals, 11.03. Used 867 MHz SperDrive, $348; 1 GHz, $499; 1.33 Combo, $298; SD, $559; 1.5 Combo, $448; SuperDrive, $589.
Best Power Mac G3 and PCI Video Card Deals, 11.02. Used beige 300 MHz, $25; G4/366, $49; blue & white 350, $80; 400, $90; 450, $105; PCI video cards from $15; shipping additional.
Best Power Mac G4 and AGP Video Card Deals, 11.02. Used 400 MHz, $50; 733 MHz, $69; 933 MHz, $209; 1.25 GHz dual, $299.
Best 15" MacBook Pro Deals, 11.02. Used 2.0 GHz, $800; 2.2, $900; 2.4, $1,000; refurb 2.53, $1,449; 2.66, $1,699; 2.8, $1,949; 3.06, $2,169; new 2.53, $1,579; 2.66, $1,799; more.
Best Mac mini Deals, 10.30. Used 1.33 GHz G4 mini, $379; 1.42, $389; 1.5, $419; 1.83 GHz Core Duo, $350; Core 2, $439; new 2.26 GHz nVidia, $580; 2.53 GHz, $770; Server, $990.
Best G4 iBook Deals, 10.30. Used 12" 1.07 GHz Combo, $225; 1.33 GHz, $298; 14" 1 GHz, $349; 1.33 GHz, $398; 1.42 GHz SuperDrive, $498.
Best Classic Mac OS Deals, 10.30. System 6.0.8 floppies, $10; 7.1, $12; 7.5, $20; 7.5 CD, $4; 7.6 $13; 8.1, $11; 8.5, $20; 8.6, $90; 9.0, $20; 9.2.2, $30.
More deals in our archive.

About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts

Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2009 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Advice presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Access our RSS news feed at http://lowendmac.com/feed.xml.
Email may be published at our discretion; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. If you prefer your message not be published, mark it "not for publication." Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.
Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iBook, iMac, eMac, iPod, iPhone, PowerBook, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.