High Megapixel Compact Digicams May Be Worse than We Thought

Dan Knight - 2008.02.21

Last month we looked at the megapixel myth. As we noted then, "in the rush to market megapixels, images can actually be worse with a high megapixel camera than from a lower megapixel one."

The sad truth is that it's worse than we thought.

Mason Resnick of Adorama has exposed another issue caused by an unhealthy fixation on megapixels: As compact digicams include more and more megapixels on their tiny sensors, something has to give. In Stop the Megapixel Madness!, he says,

"...each pixel has its own microscopic lens, and each lens is separated by a microns-wide wall, or septum, to prevent light from falling from one pixel into the next and thereby reducing image quality . . . to make room for eight, nine, or (heaven help us, again) ten million pixels, those septums get either unusably thin, or are removed altogether."

The result of removing the septum? Spillover from one pixel another, which can cause fuzziness and increase noise (the digital equivalent of film grain).

As we've said before, 3 megapixels is all you need for a great 5x7, and most people can't tell the difference between an 8x10 from a 3 MP image or a 6 MP one. A 6 MP digital will easily give you a 12x18 print that looks very sharp indeed.

So why the fixation with megapixels? It's not quality, it's marketing. If 3 MP is better than 1.3 MP, and 6 MP is better than 4 MP, then 12 MP must be even better.

While it's true that more megapixels means better images that can be printed even larger on digital single lens reflex (DSLR) cameras, that's not always the case with compact digital cameras. Beyond a certain point, the small imagers with their increasingly small individual pixel sensor get small enough that digital noise becomes a factor. Your photos may have more pixels, but they are also likely to have a lot more grain.

Make the pixels small enough, and the septum (the dividers between the individual sensors), no matter how thin you make it, ends up cutting off some light, further increasing grain. The solution? For some manufacturers, it's removing the septum, which means that light can spill over to adjacent pixels.

The result is a lower contrast, grainier, fuzzier image, as Adorama clearly shows on its website. Too many megapixels in a compact digicam can mean worse images, not the better ones you would expect. And none of the manufacturers are going to make a point of telling you if they don't have a septum on their imager.

Don't believe it? Check out the comparison images that Adorama has posted (reduced even further below). Even when greatly reduced to 0.15 MP for use on the Web, those shot with an 8 MP DSLR look gorgeous, as everyone would expect. Those shot with an 8 MP compact camera look horrid: low contrast, washed out colors, more grain, and blurring of details. And there's nothing you can do in Photoshop to fix those problems.

You can, however, make matters even worse by shooting at a higher ISO setting. Again, it's something DSLRs can do well with their larger sensors, but as far as compacts go, it's going to further increase noise and graininess in your images.

Comparison of 8 MP DSLR vs. 8 MP compact (reduced from Adorama website)

As Resnick notes, "You may be able to make big blow-ups with your 12MP compact, but they won't look as good as manufacturers want you to believe."

Don't buy a camera based on specs. All imagers are not created equal. All lenses are not created equal. And all 8 MP images are not created equal, and 8 MP may be more than you need. Kudos to Adorama, a camera retailer, for pointing out the truth.

Look at the images the camera creates. That's the true test, not the number of megapixels in its images.

Join us on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

Recent Digigraphica Columns

Tiny Interchangeable Lens Pentax Q Has an Interesting Tie to the Past, 2011.06.23. The Pentax Q fits on a keychain, has a fast normal lens, and reminds me of the tiny Pentax Auto 110 SLR introduced in 1978.
Nikon D40 Provides Lots of Quality at a Nice Price, 2008.10.28. For most photographers most of the time, Nikon's D40 DSLR has all the features and quality necessary and an affordable price.
Digital SLRs are affordable enough to replace 35mm SLRs, 2008.03.11. Prices for DSLRs have dropped to record lows, and image quality generally matches or exceeds that of film.
More in the Digigraphica index.

Links for the Day

Mac of the Day: Mac IIfx, introduced 1990.03.19. This 'wicked fast' 40 MHz Mac trumped the 33 MHz DOS world.
February 14 in LEM history: 98: A perfect compact Mac - 00: Extended computer warranties worth the cost? - Making your PC work with your Mac - 01: Customize Microsoft Word - 02: Quadra revives a passion for computing - 03: Real world performance - DIY Pismo screen replacement - Best Mac for writing - 03: Fastest browser on the Mac - 06: 15" MacBook Pro - Impressions of a newly acquired Lisa - Finding and using free WiFi - Apple should liberate OS 9 - 07: New Mac mini cheaper than upgrading a Power Mac - 08: Falling in love with OS X
Support Low End Mac

Recent Deals

About LEM Support Usage Privacy Contact

Low End Mac is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc. Entire Low End Mac website copyright ©1997-2012 by Cobweb Publishing, Inc. unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, iPad iPhone, iMac, iPod, MacBook, MagSafe, Mac Pro, Apple TV, and AirPort are registered trademarks of Apple Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are hereby acknowledged.
Advice is presented in good faith, but what works for one may not work for all. Please report errors to .
LINKS: We allow and encourage links to any public page as long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking it.
Email may be published at our discretion unless marked "not for publication"; email addresses will not be published without permission, and we will encrypt them in hopes of avoiding spammers. Letters may be edited for length, context, and to match house style.
PRIVACY: We don't collect personal information unless you explicitly provide it. For more details, see our Terms of Use.

Custom Search

Follow Low End Mac on Twitter
Join Low End Mac on Facebook

Low End Mac Reader Specials

TypeStyler 11 is now in the Mac App Store!! -- Special Introductory Price of $59.95!! -- To Buy From The Mac App Store Click Here Now!! Or buy direct from Strider Software.

Don't install Parallels to play poker online! Poker Mac will show you how to download and install a native Mac poker and Mac Casino applications in minutes.

Affiliates

Amazon.com
The Apple Store
The iTunes Store
PC Connection Express
GainSaver
Parallels Desktop for Mac
eBay