High Megapixel Compact Digicams May Be Worse than We Thought
Dan Knight - 2008.02.21
Bookmark in del.icio.usLow End Mac Reader Specials
Download Typestyler, still the Ultimate Styling Tool for Internet, Print and Video Graphics. Works great in Classic with a Native OS X Version on the way. Free Tryout: www.typestyler.com
LA Computer Company: LA Computer Company: Specials on AppleCare, Apple Displays, MacBooks, iMac's, MacBook Pros, Laptop and iPod accessories and more. Apple A/C Adapters for laptops starting at $25.00 Call 1-800-941-7654 or Click Here.
OWC: NewerTech miniStack FireWire/USB 2.0 HD & Hub Up to 1.0TB of Performance Storage + FW/USB2 Powered Hubs - convenient & sleek 6.5" x 6.5" x 1.5" Featured: 500GB $169.99; 750GB $209.99; 1.0TB $339.99
Mac users can finally play Party Poker for Mac. Not only that, they can also learn how to play PokerStars for Mac.
Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.
Compare products like desktop computers, laptops, and LCD TVs side by side! All the information and reviews to make the best purchasing decision for a new cell phone GPS products or MP3 players. The Ciao network makes searching products easy for you.
New MacPro Memory 800Mhz With Apple Spec Heat Sink 2GB $104 / 4GB $172 / 8GB $338. Click to Maximize your Macs...
Last month we looked at the megapixel myth. As we noted then, "in the rush to market megapixels, images can actually be worse with a high megapixel camera than from a lower megapixel one."
The sad truth is that it's worse than we thought.
Mason Resnick of Adorama has exposed another issue caused by an unhealthy fixation on megapixels: As compact digicams include more and more megapixels on their tiny sensors, something has to give. In Stop the Megapixel Madness!, he says,
"...each pixel has its own microscopic lens, and each lens is separated by a microns-wide wall, or septum, to prevent light from falling from one pixel into the next and thereby reducing image quality . . . to make room for eight, nine, or (heaven help us, again) ten million pixels, those septums get either unusably thin, or are removed altogether."
The result of removing the septum? Spillover from one pixel another, which can cause fuzziness and increase noise (the digital equivalent of film grain).
As we've said before, 3 megapixels is all you need for a great 5x7, and most people can't tell the difference between an 8x10 from a 3 MP image or a 6 MP one. A 6 MP digital will easily give you a 12x18 print that looks very sharp indeed.
So why the fixation with megapixels? It's not quality, it's marketing. If 3 MP is better than 1.3 MP, and 6 MP is better than 4 MP, then 12 MP must be even better.
While it's true that more megapixels means better images that can be printed even larger on digital single lens reflex (DSLR) cameras, that's not always the case with compact digital cameras. Beyond a certain point, the small imagers with their increasingly small individual pixel sensor get small enough that digital noise becomes a factor. Your photos may have more pixels, but they are also likely to have a lot more grain.
Make the pixels small enough, and the septum (the dividers between the individual sensors), no matter how thin you make it, ends up cutting off some light, further increasing grain. The solution? For some manufacturers, it's removing the septum, which means that light can spill over to adjacent pixels.
The result is a lower contrast, grainier, fuzzier image, as Adorama clearly shows on its website. Too many megapixels in a compact digicam can mean worse images, not the better ones you would expect. And none of the manufacturers are going to make a point of telling you if they don't have a septum on their imager.
Don't believe it? Check out the comparison images that Adorama has posted (reduced even further below). Even when greatly reduced to 0.15 MP for use on the Web, those shot with an 8 MP DSLR look gorgeous, as everyone would expect. Those shot with an 8 MP compact camera look horrid: low contrast, washed out colors, more grain, and blurring of details. And there's nothing you can do in Photoshop to fix those problems.
You can, however, make matters even worse by shooting at a higher ISO setting. Again, it's something DSLRs can do well with their larger sensors, but as far as compacts go, it's going to further increase noise and graininess in your images.
Comparison of 8 MP DSLR vs. 8 MP compact (reduced from Adorama
website)
As Resnick notes, "You may be able to make big blow-ups with your 12MP compact, but they won't look as good as manufacturers want you to believe."
Don't buy a camera based on specs. All imagers are not created equal. All lenses are not created equal. And all 8 MP images are not created equal, and 8 MP may be more than you need. Kudos to Adorama, a camera retailer, for pointing out the truth.
Look at the images the camera creates. That's the true test, not the
number of megapixels in its images.
Dan Knight has been into photography since 1973, worked at several camera stores over the years, and switched from film to digital several years ago. He is the publisher of Low End Mac.
Recent Digigraphica Columns
- Digital SLRs are affordable enough to replace 35mm SLRs, 03.11. Prices for DSLRs have dropped to record lows, and image quality generally matches or exceeds that of film.
- No more ugly dates (in your digital photos), 03.06. Tired of ugly, blocky, wrong colored dates in your digital images? This proposal could eliminate them for good, giving you control over typeface, color, and placement.
- Busting the Megapixel Myth, 01.10. More megapixels can mean a better image, but in many cases it's more than you need and sometimes it can mean worse photos.
- More in the Digigraphica index.
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- Mac Pro overclocking, Windependence with Darwine, Blu-ray for Macs, and more, Mac News Review, 07.04. Also more on running Leopard on non-Apple hardware, Ubuntu on a Mac mini, the first autofocus webcam with Zeiss optics for Macs, and more.
- Wouldn't life be great with an iSlate?, John Hatchett, Recycled Computing, 07.04. PDAs and smartphones are too small for some tasks, full-fledged Tablet PCs are overkill, and ebook readers are too limited. Apple has the tech to own this niche.
- Mac of the Day: 'WallStreet' PowerBook G3, May 1998 - WallStreet offered 3 screen sizes and CPU speeds from 233 to 292 MHz.
- List of the Day: System 6 is the email list for those who choose System 6.
- The Macintosh Portable started a notebook revolution, Carl Nygren, Classic Macs in the Intel Age, 07.03. Before Apple introduced the Mac Portable, notebook computers were text-based and ran MS-DOS. Ever since, graphical interfaces have been the norm for laptops.
- More links in our archive.
About LEM | Support | Usage | Privacy | Contacts
Have a question?
Ask an expert!
Navigation
Used Mac Dealers
Apple History
Best Used Macs
Video Cards
Email Lists
InfoMac's Low
End Mac Forum
Favorite Sites
MacSurfer
MacMinute
MacInTouch
MyAppleMenu
InfoMac
Macs Only!
The Mac Observer
Accelerate Your Mac
RetroMacCast
PB Central
MacWindows
The Vintage Mac
Museum
DealMac
DealsOnTheWeb
Mac2Sell
ramseeker
Mac Driver Museum
JAG's House
System
6 Heaven
System 7 Today
the pickle's Low-End
Mac FAQ
Abandonware
Petition
Mac vs. PC Info
Affiliates
The Apple
Store
Mac
Connection
MacMall
TechRestore
MacResQ
ExperCom
Crucial
Memory
batteries.com
Advertise
